In Washington state, elementary school teachers and union representatives are at odds with the statewide teachers union. They accuse union leaders of being overly influenced by activists. Their main contention is against a ballot measure that, they argue, is crucial for restoring trust between parents and schools.
Travis Reap, a fifth-grade teacher from the North Thurston School District, expressed his concerns to a news outlet, stating, “I don’t think the union really represents us to the fullest.” He remarked on how, at various levels, activists often dominate discussions, sharpening their agenda against the interests of some teachers.
Reap, who also serves as a local representative for the North Thurston Education Association, is resisting the Washington Education Association’s opposition to a custody measure planned for the November 2026 ballot. This initiative, backed by the group Let’s Go Washington, aims to reimpose the original 2024 Parents’ Bill of Rights. The bill seeks to bar biological boys from competing in girls’ sports.
According to Reap, the proposed custody measure would mandate that schools provide parents with records and information about their children upon request. He explained, “This ensures that if a parent asks for documents or information, the school will comply rather than hide it.”
One of his big concerns is that, currently, even kindergarteners might be urged to adopt different names or pronouns at school without parental notification. He believes it’s essential for parents to be informed to make necessary choices regarding their child’s well-being.
The Washington Education Association Board of Directors opposes both measures. Reap has aligned himself with the advocacy group Washington Families for Freedom, which campaigns against what it labels “dangerous” initiatives.
Critics argue that these custody measures could lead to the exclusion of LGBTQ students, heightening risks of abuse, mental health issues, and even homelessness. They also express worries that changes in women’s sports could prompt invasive gender testing.
Reap counters that such arguments often rely on exaggerated scenarios and misinterpret the intended measures. He pointed out that sports physical exams are already required and emphasized that while educators shouldn’t dictate a student’s gender identity, parents must remain informed. He also mentioned that many teachers privately share his views but choose silence to avoid backlash.
“I believe most educators are intimidated to voice their opinions, fearing they’ll be labeled as bigots,” he said. He continued, “We should share as much information as we can with parents so they can make the best decisions for their families—ultimately, it’s their choice.”
Reap noted the significant divide over issues of gender identity within educational circles. Some educators perceive this as a moral issue. “There’s an apparent gap,” he said, suggesting that activist educators feel justified in their approaches, treating dissenting views as harmful.
Despite the potential for pushback, Reap has received positive feedback from community members, many expressing appreciation for his courage openly to discuss these topics. “As I move through the district, people recognize me and say, ‘Thank you for this; I wish I could do it too,’” he recounted.
The Washington Education Association has yet to respond to requests for comment on these developments.
