The Democratic National Committee hosted the women’s NCAA Tournament title game Sunday to close out its annual athletic convention inside Rocket Mortgage Fieldhouse in Cleveland.
Dawn Staley’s South Carolina Gamecocks bounced back from Caitlin Clark’s Iowa Hawkeyes 87-75 to conclude one of the most remarkable and enlightening women’s hoops seasons in this country’s history.
I have no intention of watching Caitlin Clark play in the WNBA. no way.
I’m sure many of you didn’t know that women’s basketball is deeply tied to Democratic Party politics. that’s right. The sports-loving Democratic base buys WNBA season tickets, treats the women’s Final Four as a spring break “freaknik,” and sees the rise of women’s hoops as a key marker of patriarchal subversion.
The title match between Dawn and Caitlin represented a dream come true. Fifty-two years ago, Title IX pledged to give women fulfillment and happiness through the advancement of masculinity.
As it turns out, that dream was really a nightmare. That’s the lesson for Dawn and Kaitlyn, and this entire women’s basketball season. Be careful what you wish for.
2024’s Most Influential Jock, Caitlin Clark’s rise to superstar athlete status has exposed the cruel reality of Democratic Party-orchestrated egalitarianism.
For those who want women to run the world, this year’s women’s college basketball tournament provided a preview of what that world will be like.
For the crime of being white, straight, and talented, Clark’s basketball fraternity has made us the first time since Tonya Harding colluded with Jeff Gillooly before the 1994 U.S. Figure Skating Championships. It unleashed a level of envy and bitterness I had never seen before.
Some of the greatest players in women’s basketball history have taken shots at Clark, from Sheryl Swoopes to Angel Reese to Diana Taurasi to Lynette Woodard to Brianna Stewart.
It’s even worse in the media. Critics are twisting themselves into pretzels to articulate arguments that discredit Clark’s accomplishments. Clark chose to play for his home state team and led the Hawkeyes to back-to-back NCAA title games. She has never played with a WNBA-caliber player. However, sports experts are leading the charge in arguing that she cannot be considered her greatest player because she never won a title in her four years at the University of Iowa. Critics also claim that Clark teased his opponent in the same way that Reese teased Clark after last year’s championship game. it’s a lie.
Clark was both a blessing and a curse to women’s basketball. She is bringing unprecedented attention to the sport. But many people don’t like what they see. The increased masculinity of a woman and her joy, anger, and sadness are mixed together to create an evil feeling that cannot be escaped once seen. They are not likable.
I have no intention of watching Clark play in the WNBA. no way.
I enjoyed Clark in a college setting because the college game still has the thinnest surface of purity. Most female college athletes don’t have head-to-toe tattoos. They are not women who imitate men.
I had no interest in drag shows. I don’t want to see men dress like women or women act or look like men.
Clark made a mistake coming into the WNBA. She should return to college basketball for a fifth season. She could easily earn over $20 million with her name, image, and her popularity. She could retire, marry her boyfriend, and become a lifelong ambassador for Iowa State and women’s college hoops. She won’t survive what awaits her in the WNBA. The league’s culture is racist and hostile to heterosexuality.
To be honest, the culture is women’s basketball They are racist and hostile to heterosexuality.
That’s another aspect of the Dawn and Caitlin Show. Dawn Staley is a leading women’s basketball player. She is a golden child.
On Saturday, a South Carolina coach expressed support for men with mental disabilities being allowed to participate in women’s sports.
“My opinion is that women should play,” Staley said. “If you consider yourself a woman and want to play sports, or vice versa, you should be able to play. That’s my opinion.”
Staley said being a man or a woman is a consideration. That’s an opinion.
Are you following this? Women’s basketball represents the Democratic Party’s mindset. It’s a coalition of racists and insane women determined to eradicate patriarchy.
Staley represents the quintessential black female Democrat. She claims she serves God while distancing herself from the actual content of the Bible.
Her tears and praise to God after the game struck me as all scripted and dishonest. You cannot affirm transgenderism one day and affirm the God portrayed in the Bible the next day. That’s contradictory. Without publicly acknowledging past mistakes, he can be a flaming racist who slanders BYU volleyball fans and Iowa coach Lisa Bruder one year, and a fervent Bible-reciting Christian the next. It is not possible.
I don’t buy what Staley sells.
This year’s Women’s Final Four was a huge stage for the feminist movement and the Democratic Party. Anyone paying attention is bound to not like what they see. You saw people hating Caitlin Clark because of her skin color and perceived sexuality. You saw Staley put on a performance aimed at convincing Christians that their faith doesn’t have to align with the God of the Bible.
We saw a message and culture consistent with the DNC.
