Issue: The ramifications of the five-week government shutdown on services like SNAP
It seems the American public is really feeling the strain, yet those we voted into office appear more focused on their own agendas than on our needs (“Democrats Play the Hunger Games,” Oct. 29).
This is a power struggle, but it’s hurting the very people who put them there.
Currently, Democrats, especially Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, seem to be spectators as their constituents face hardships.
Eileen Simon
Old Bridge, New Jersey
Millions depend on SNAP benefits, which hang in the balance.
I used to work with the health department promoting SNAP at farmers markets. It’s a beneficial program for everyone, really.
Democrats point fingers at Republicans, and the cycle continues.
Why can’t we all just get along?
Matt Engel
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
It’s the President, Vice President, and Congress’s responsibility to ensure we receive services as taxpayers.
I don’t think they should get a paycheck while the government is closed. They haven’t done their jobs, so why should they be compensated?
Paul Finer
Greenberg
Let’s be clear; this federal shutdown can’t be blamed on anyone else but President Trump.
His “Big Beautiful Act” proposed to increase health insurance premiums for many low-income individuals and cut coverage for millions. Democrats weren’t going to support such an immoral measure.
Trump knew he would need bipartisan support by October 1, yet just days before the shutdown, he canceled a meeting with Democratic leaders. And now here we are.
Weeks have passed, yet 45 million more Americans could lose essential food assistance.
Robert Griffith
Naples, Florida
Democrats really need to recognize their role. This is what your party stands for.
They refuse to reopen the government, even though millions rely on aid to feed their families. It feels like they’re just trying to score points against Trump in a game they can’t win otherwise.
Bill McCreary
Levittown
I don’t see why members of Congress should receive any pay at all.
They chose to run for office, so they should be accountable to the public.
They often vote for pay raises for themselves, while others are left struggling without any income during a shutdown.
This is why the public has such a disdain for politicians.
They represent the worst aspects of leadership.
Lou Bivona
Belleville
Issue: Cindy Adams’ critique of mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa
I genuinely enjoy reading Cindy Adams’ columns, but her recent one really grabbed my attention (“Nine Lives of ‘Mayor’ Sliwa,” October 28).
Should Andrew Cuomo win, his bail ban would persist, making New York City quite perilous.
If Zoran Mamdani takes the lead, we might find ourselves in an even tougher spot, particularly with the looming threat of Rikers Island closing.
While Mr. Sliwa might lack a typical resume, neither does Mr. Mamdani. As for Mr. Cuomo, his background is riddled with scandals and poor decisions.
Linda Calabrese
Brooklyn
Cindy Adams’ criticism of Sliwa is quite severe.
His community work and accomplishments in radio are commendable.
Though Sliwa’s chances of winning the mayoral race seem slim, his performance in debates indicates he may be the strongest candidate of the three.
CD Par
Rumson, New Jersey
If you’d like to share your thoughts on today’s news, please send your comments (including your full name and city) to letters@nypost.com. Submissions may be edited for clarity, length, and style.
