So, what’s the deal with Tim Walz and his fellow Democrats in this land of 10,000 issues? They’re certainly setting some trends.
Five years after Minneapolis kicked off a wave of chaos that echoed the Watts riots of 1965, the city is once again grappling with violence and influential figures. Honestly, I didn’t see this coming.
Walz and his team, just like the political leaders in California, are dealing with significant turmoil caused by BLM during the George Floyd riots. They seem to be making the most of a situation where lawlessness is rampant, with criminals taking over the streets.
California Governor Gavin Newsom previously claimed there were no issues until Trump got involved. Los Angeles’ part-time mayor, Karen Bass, criticized the president’s National Guard deployment as a “chaotic escalation.”
And here we are again, reminding voters why they didn’t want to support certain people. Kamala Harris called the violent aftermath a “mostly peaceful” situation.
But let’s be real—this isn’t about protests. In cities like Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and Newark, Democrats and their more violent supporters are actively obstructing federal immigration laws.
It’s a serious issue that goes beyond the failure to protect citizens and also includes requesting National Guard support.
No one is labeling it a “riot,” yet it certainly seems to challenge the authority of the U.S. government.
What else can you call a violent group waving foreign flags and backed by money from outside? It’s hard not to say they support organizations like Antifa. They quickly mobilize at places like the San Francisco ICE facility.
Interestingly, the same Antifa groups have been linked to chaos for nearly a decade.
This ongoing conflict with law enforcement, fueled by funding from individuals like George Soros, has led to criminals getting back on the streets almost immediately after being charged.
So, Gavin, who’s really the “threat to democracy” here?
Let’s be straightforward: despite what some media outlets will tell you, these are not just “protesters”; they’re violent individuals who deserve to be treated accordingly.
This criticism could just as easily apply to elected Democrats and some local judges who seem to support actions some might even describe as treasonous.
It makes you wonder, do they really understand what “illegal” means? They might think they do, but it seems they don’t quite grasp the implications for America.
This isn’t a new phenomenon; cultural Marxism has been cultivating this “revolution” for some time.
Senator Tina Smith has also played a part by inciting unrest during the Floyd riots, pushing for “protests” and labeling police roles as dangerous.
Rep. Angie Craig is not just a bystander; she’s looking to eliminate qualified immunity for police officers and supports the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.
Sadly, their actions are reflected in today’s landscape in California.
A while back, the LAPD Union Leader warned that tourists feel unsafe, and the National Brotherhood of Police pointed out that problematic rhetoric from political and media figures, along with misguided policies, endangers officers.
I really hope Trump notes all this. Something has to change. Judge Jackson’s notable appointment serves as a reminder that the choice isn’t just between freedom and order. Rather, it’s about choosing between chaotic freedom and outright disorder.
