Hello, everyone.
Isn’t it interesting how simply stating the obvious seems to require bravery these days?
We really ought to get back to expressing common truths regularly.
Speaking the truth shouldn’t require courage.
Let’s not be afraid.
We should discuss when identity is significant and when it isn’t.
Two things occurred recently.
Karine Jean-Pierre gave what must be one of the most baffling interviews ever. Just to be clear, I find her incompetent. She lacks the qualifications for such a high-profile position in political and media communication.
(For reference, here’s the painfully awkward exchange, where the interviewer asks for explanations repeatedly while insisting she isn’t fooling anyone.)
So, why is she in that role?
In another instance, Katie Miller made a clear point on CNN, stating, “She’s proof that DEI doesn’t work… Why did she get hired over John Kirby? Because, as everyone noted this week, she’s clearly unqualified.”
She remarked, “Why does she keep mentioning she’s a black queer LGBT woman? It’s because that’s how she’s been coached throughout her career.”
If you observe KJP’s confusing, far-left tone during an interview with The New Yorker, you’d notice she brings up her sexual orientation at least twice.
Why does this matter? In many ways, it doesn’t. For instance, I admire Scott Bessent as a modern Treasury Secretary, and his sexuality doesn’t factor into my opinion.
Of course, the typical liberal backlash to Katie Miller’s comments is occurring now. In summary, she’s branded a bigot.
But what I’m saying is, I couldn’t care less about her personal life. Ultimately, what matters is whether she’s right.
We shouldn’t hesitate to assert this. In terms of competence, identity should be treated as secondary, if relevant at all. Can you pilot a plane? Conduct heart surgery? Operate a truck?I certainly shouldn’t have to deal with disasters, or worse, harm innocent people. During a crisis?
Based on that, I’m going to touch on where identity does matter, specifically regarding immigrants.
Those on the left will likely label me a bigot for this as well, but frankly, I don’t care. It’s crucial who we allow into this country. What kinds of people we permit entry is a significant national discussion.
Just like we shouldn’t shy away from calling out the failures of DEI in domestic politics, we should also be honest about foreign policy and immigrants.
Research from the UK indicates that Somalis and Eritreans are statistically more likely to engage in criminal activity and rely on social welfare. So, why let them in? We should expel them. They’ve all immigrated in the last five years. If they have a PhD, contribute positively, speak the language fluently, and aren’t involved in criminal activities, then fine—they can stay.
If not, it’s a no-go.
We also have data on immigration from countries like Algeria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and Sri Lanka. Again, why should we accept them? Their culture often clashes with ours, and we see minimal effort towards assimilation.
In contrast, West Africans have generally thrived here. They’re earning degrees, starting businesses, learning new languages, and enhancing American productivity. Welcome!
We need to reestablish strict controls on legal immigration. Why is there no language requirement for green cards? Anyone working here should be fluent in English.
Why even raise this issue? English is our primary language. If you want to work in the U.S., learn to speak it.
The fear of being labeled a racist or a bigot seems to have completely stifled rational thought. The question of whether suspected human traffickers should be deported isn’t up for debate. Let’s just get rid of them.
Consider that there are 1.5 million illegal immigrants benefiting from food stamps. We’re paying for that.All immigration raids should be enforced. They may call it harsh, and—oh my gosh,—racist, but I see it as basic logic.
If you entered the country unlawfully and are on food assistance, you’re out. If you’ve been here for over three years without learning the language, you’re out. If you commit a misdemeanor, for goodness’ sake, leave immediately. Let’s clear them out.
Do you think places like Tokyo or Beijing, or any other contemporary non-Western nation, deal with this kind of irrational racial self-denial? Absolutely not.
Areas of Minnesota might as well belong to Somalia at this point. Dearborn, Michigan, is nearly a massive madrasa. A Muslim mayor recently scolded a Christian pastor who attended a city council meeting opposing the renaming of an American street after someone who celebrated Hamas and Hezbollah. The mayor told the pastor he was unwelcome, saying he’d organize a parade upon the pastor’s exit.
How did we reach this situation? We allowed it. It might sound ridiculous, but the fear of being labeled as racist led us to give up our historical territory to those with no intention of integrating.
Just as we shouldn’t be obligated to change our church bells to accommodate the Muslim call to prayer five times a day, we shouldn’t feel pressured to hire based solely on someone’s sexual orientation or skin color. Why does the idea of renaming streets in America after Islamic extremists create controversy?
This is America. We value freedom, achievement, self-determination, and the principles of Western civilization. We speak English. We combat terrorism. If you’re unable to speak the language, if you glorify terrorists, or if you don’t assimilate and follow our laws, then it’s time to go.
You may label that as racist, but I just see it as common sense.
Here’s what I’m reading.
I’m shaking my head.
Exclusive: Undercover footage reveals Utah schools ‘rebranding’ DEI to bypass the ban, according to a complaint
—
These judges are out of their minds.
Court reverses President Trump’s decision on Portland National Guard deployment
—
I really don’t want to know his whereabouts.
No one seems to know where Tyler Robinson’s transgender boyfriend is.
