Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent criticizes the New York Times during their summit

U.S. Treasury Secretary Critiques New York Times at Summit

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent took aim at the New York Times during a summit, accusing the publication of misreporting on President Donald Trump’s health. This happened at the 2025 DealBook Summit held in New York City, where Bessent expressed concerns over recent articles claiming a decline in Trump’s condition.

Bessent stated, “In 20, 30, 40, 50 years, the New York Times will no longer be the paper of record,” while addressing New York Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin. This remark came amid unflattering reports about Trump’s health that, according to Bessent, have undermined the newspaper’s credibility.

One article titled “The days are getting shorter and signs of fatigue: Trump faces the reality of aging while in office,” suggested that Trump’s energy levels have waned since his presidency began, noting a decrease in his public appearances.

In response to the report, Trump had dismissed the claims, asserting on social media that he had won the 2024 election by a wide margin and that the country was thriving. He criticized the media’s portrayal of his physical and mental state, insisting that the reports were wrong. Bessent echoed this sentiment, remarking, “This is 100 percent fake. He called me twice at 2 a.m. last week, not three times.”

He added that he no longer reads the Times, describing it as a “swamp of enthusiasm.” Bessent’s comments have drawn criticism from some who believe his involvement in events associated with the Times could undermine its standing in journalism.

Addressing perceived double standards in media coverage, Bessent further remarked on the lack of attention the press paid to former President Joe Biden’s health, highlighting the difference in scrutiny between the two leaders. He noted recent Cabinet meetings held by Trump, contrasting them with Biden’s limited interactions with his Cabinet.

A spokesperson for the New York Times defended their reporting, stating it was based on solid first-hand accounts and that personal attacks won’t sway their commitment to investigative journalism. They reaffirmed the importance of an independent press in helping the public understand the government and its leaders.