Before the pandemic,
Brianne Dressen Living in Salt Lake City, she was living the active life she had always wanted. She went rock climbing with her husband, a chemist in the US Army. She drove her two children to soccer games and piano practice. And I taught kindergarten.
In November 2020, everything came to a screeching halt. It wasn’t because of union-led school closures, lockdowns or election results, it was because of her participation in the AstraZeneca vaccine trial.
“I walked into the clinic in good spirits and the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy.”
The experimental vaccine allegedly left a 42-year-old Utah mother with debilitating injuries.
Dressen cannot bring a product liability lawsuit against the company for the following reasons:
Federal Public Preparedness and Emergency Preparedness Act. But she could accuse the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giants of breaching contracts, and that’s exactly what she’s aiming for.
Dressen is
lawsuit On Monday, the U.S. District Court for Utah ruled that the British-Swedish pharmaceutical giant will pay for her medical expenses as promised after she developed a debilitating neurological disease caused by the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. claimed that he did not. .
Daniel Horowitz, who received Mr. Dressen’s complaint, is the host of “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz” on the Blaze Podcast Network and author of “.Rise of the Fourth Reich: Confronting coronavirus fascism with a new Nuremberg trial and ensuring it never happens againBlaze News said, “Despite thousands of academic studies and case studies on injuries that affect every organ system, victims remain isolated with few legal avenues for compensation.” It’s shocking,” he said.
“We have documents from VAERS, V-Safe, vaccine manufacturers, and a report from the European Medicines Agency that all show catastrophic levels of injury, but at this point in time in any country. “There is no critical mass of political movement to abolish these unlimited compensations for “criminal enterprises,” Horowitz continued. “It’s also strange how AstraZeneca was taken off the market, but the even worse mRNA injection is still being funded and promoted by the government.”
background
The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine was a viral vector vaccine developed in collaboration with the University of Oxford and manufactured by the University for various companies.
Serum Institute of India.
The AstraZeneca vaccine will not be rolled out in the U.S., although Dressen and 32,000 Americans have participated in vaccine trials in their home country and the Biden administration has agreed to share up to 60 million doses with other countries. There wasn’t. But billions of doses have been administered around the world.
It soon became clear that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as health authorities across the UK had assured. After all, there were numerous reports of healthy recipients developing abnormal bleeding, low platelets, blood clots, and even death.
German and Scandinavian researchers
Decided Some recipients were found to develop a clotting disorder called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, which activates platelets to produce antibodies that cause blood clots.
Despite the growing number of potential victims, AstraZeneca
was suggested “There was no evidence of increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or thrombocytopenia.”, within defined age groups, genders, groups, or specific countries. ”
The company’s claims have become as old as milk.
Last year, Jamie Scott, a father of two who suffered permanent blood clot-related brain damage, filed a lawsuit against the company. His complaint was followed by dozens more, which eventually led to a class action lawsuit.
Months after Scott sued AstraZeneca, the company said in court documents in February: “It is acknowledged that in very rare cases, the AZ vaccine may cause the following symptoms.” he admitted. [thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome]. The causal relationship is unknown. ”
The following month, the company withdrew its “marketing authorization” in the European Union. That application took effect last week.telegraph paper
report AstraZeneca is expected to remove the vaccine from all other markets where it has been approved.
“Hollowed out”
Dressens
lawsuitReportedly the first of its kind to be launched in the United States against AstraZeneca, the company is requiring participants in its vaccine trial to complete a test clinic visit for various procedures. It alleges that the company provided various written promises, including financial reimbursement. Financial reimbursement will be made for each completed call related to the study. Compensation for research-related injuries.
“The moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract was formed.”
“Defendants defined ‘research injury’ as follows.”[i]”Injuries caused by a vaccine, test, or procedure are not acceptable,” the lawsuit states, adding, “Defendants say, ‘The sponsor will provide you with a refund, provided the cost is reasonable and you are not the cause of the injury.’ “We promised to pay the medical expenses for research injuries.” You are yourself. ”
“The moment the substance entered Bri’s blood, a solemn contract was formed,” the complaint states. “Her performance was complete and the defendants’ commitments were irrevocable.”
When things escalated, the lawsuit alleges the company effectively abandoned Dressen.
“I was a completely hollowed-out version of who I used to be.”
Dressen claimed that she felt a tingling sensation in her arm within an hour of receiving the injection. Paresthesias were apparently not temporary or focal. It quickly spread to her other arm.
“Other progressively alarming symptoms developed that night: blurred vision, double vision, headache, sound sensitivity, loud ringing in the ears (ringing in the ears), nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills,” the complaint states. .
In the weeks that followed, a tingling sensation reportedly spread to Dressen’s legs. She said the continued vomiting caused her to lose 20 pounds while her vomiting and other symptoms worsened.
“I went to the doctor’s office in good spirits and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy,” Dressen recalls. “The little girl’s voice was too painful to hear. The little boy’s hand was too painful to touch. There was no respite, no respite, no escape. No answers, no help, only questions and my… I was just afraid of what was going to hit my body, and it got worse day by day as new symptoms piled up.”
“I was a completely hollowed-out version of who I was,” Dressen added.
In June 2021, a team of neurologists at the National Institutes of Health reported that they diagnosed Dressen with:Neuropathy after vaccination. ”
Three years later, Dressen is still “disabled,” according to the complaint. “I’m a shadow of my former self. I can’t work, I can’t do any athletic activities, I can’t raise a family like I used to, and I can only drive a few blocks at a time.”
dressen
Said What’s worse, the Telegraph says, is that her children, now aged nine and 11, have no recollection of what their mother was like before her injury.
“It’s really bad. What’s even worse, the biggest punishment in all of this is the impact on the children,” Dressen said.
painful and expensive
Mr. Dressen’s lawsuit alleges that AstraZeneca ignored multiple requests for assistance until it ultimately collected just $1,243.30, which “covered the lost medical costs that Mr. Bri had incurred and would continue to incur.” It claims that it is a small part of economic costs such as wages.
All told, Dressen is believed to have spent $3,500 per treatment on biweekly medication. One of the drugs she currently takes costs her more than $430,000 a year. With the help of her insurance, she currently pays about $119,000.
“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply appalling.”
To access the $1,243.30, Mr. Dressen would have to release further responsibility for his care from AstraZeneca.
“The way we have been and continue to be treated is simply astonishing,” the plaintiff’s husband, Brian Dressen, reportedly said in the complaint.
The Telegraph reported that Utah law allows plaintiffs suing for breach of contract to recover damages and costs arising from the alleged breach. Although Dressen has not filed a lawsuit seeking a specific amount of money, he could be required to pay AstraZeneca not only for legal fees and medical expenses, but also for additional damages such as lost income and emotional distress. be.
A company spokesperson told the Telegraph that AstraZeneca does not comment on ongoing litigation. But she said: “Patient safety is our top priority. The body of evidence and real-world data from clinical trials continues to show that the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has an acceptable safety profile. “This has been consistently demonstrated by regulators around the world.” It says the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of potential side effects, which are extremely rare. ”
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
