SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Warriors vs. Rockets will be a battle for the future of basketball

Former NBA players and longtime fans have complained about the lack of offensive diversity in today’s league, which has always been a major part of the sport’s discourse, and appears to be more broader each year. Critics call the NBA the Copycat League. There, one team understands the advantageous offensive scheme or behavior, and the other teams follow and begin to do the same.

Certainly there Some The truth about it – basketball teams, like all sports organizations, have always been stolen freely from each other’s most effective schemes. But when you’re actually looking around the league, there are more variations than ever before. Celtics The Cavaliers play quarantine basketball to force defenses while they rely on ball movement and cutting to abandon the set’s defense.

Oh, and if you think every team is chucking the three, you should probably look at Oklahoma City’s Thunder and Shy Gilgauss Alexander.

But perhaps the best illustration of the league’s offensive diversity is Golden State Warriors‘match Houston Rockets In the round playoffs. This series is a battle for the general offensive philosophy and the soul of basketball, and the future of the NBA offensive can be balanced.

The Rockets are a new twist of old basketball truth

Photo by Barry Gossage/Nbae via Getty Images

On one side of the round’s most compelling matchup is the Houston Rockets. This is a team that is completely leaning towards traditional tactics and strategies, but has modern athleticism and skills. Unlike most teams in the league, Houston plays two big guys (Steven Adams and Alperencenguen) for the majority of the game. Contrary to modern beliefs about spacing and shooting – this suggests that opening the floor by playing four or five shooters at the boundary is the most effective attack strategy – Rocket wants something completely different, such as your beat user and your approach out.

Posting an All-Star break, the lineup with Adams and Sengan is attacking a ridiculous 49.7% of their team’s shots while on the floor. They’re actually just throwing the ball into the rim and want one of their big names to clean it up. Do you think the NBA is soft and everyone is just shooting 3? Look at the Twin Towers in Houston. Both spend a lot of time on paint, and after seeing what happens to someone who tries, they beat up bold enough to venture towards the rim.

The Rockets’ guard and wing play also exudes toughness and grit. They play super-physical on the boundary line and check you out with your hands to forget – Dillon Brooks is perhaps the most ’80s bad boy Pistons-esque player in the league, setting the tone for them defensively (and with his constant trash talk). There are also Amen Thompson and Fred Vanvleet. It itself is two physical Humpy Defenders. Oh, they are led by coaches who not only accept the story of physicality and garbage, but also encourage encouragement, as is evident from calling on Steph Curry, one of the NBA’s most beloved and respected stars. “cry.” Other coaches may suggest similar points with passive offensive presses, but few are as embarrassing and dull as old school Udoka.

The Warriors are pushing smallballs up to the natural endpoint

Golden State Warriors v Brooklyn Net

On the other side is the Golden State Warriors, perhaps the league’s most innovative offensive team. Of course, warriors at the forefront of modern basketball tactics are nothing new. They are believed to have launched a smallball revolution, and the famous 2010 “Death Lineup” is the perfect example of how to move basketball forward. The rest of the league still played two big guys who were barely looting in or around the paint, but Golden State’s most dangerous lineup actually had a 6’6 Draymond Green in the middle position and a combination of Harrison Burns, Andrei Ghdara, or Kevin Durant (depending on a year).

This year’s Warriors Squad is moving further. Not only are they still starting green at the center, but the rest of their lineup is even smaller than they typically have before. Their “power forward” is Jimmy Butler, only 6’7. They have started the smallball trend, but now they are pushing it to new heights…with players closer to the ground than ever before.

It all sets philosophical conflicts

The juxtaposition of these two styles shows a considerable matchup, as they line up twin towers on one side and small balls on the other. Will the Rockets’ frontline control the Warriors to a point where they are forced to go with Kevon Rooney at 5am? Or, on the contrary, does Golden State’s off-ball movement and positional versatility match Houston with more speed and speed? Both teams may come to the series trying to play the brand of balls that have reached this point – Rocket’s 2000s ball and the Warriors’ modern little ball – who were first forced to adjust can talk about this series as well as the future of basketball team building and tactics.

That may sound hyperbolic, but it’s not crazy to say that the results of this series could drive NBA strategies forward. If Golden State wins, the league is even more leaning towards having as many shooters and ball handlers as possible on the court, regardless of height. But if Houston separates the upset, they are the weak (+138 at Fanduel), despite being the second seed with a home court advantage, the NBA can continue its transition to something similar to the more athletic and dynamic version of the 2000s air hoop, highlighted at bullies and massive frontlines.

In short, the dominant attack scheme for the next few years could be determined in some small ways, whether the Warriors can prove they are years away again, or whether Houston’s size can give them a problem.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News