FBI whistleblower Kyle Serafin joins us Sara Gonzalez While appearing on “Sara Gonzalez Unfiltered,” she revealed that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the man who attempted to assassinate President Trump, may be being fostered.
It’s an assumption one can’t help but make, given that it’s repeatedly said Crooks has “no criminal history.”
The suspicions grow even more when the Heritage Foundation’s investigation reveals that “individuals who regularly visited or were present at Crooks’ home and workplace also visited a building on Gallery Place in Washington, DC, located very close to the FBI office.”
Investigative journalist and Blaze Media correspondent Steve Baker isn’t entirely convinced the information points to a motive.
“It’s a huge facility,” he says of Gallery Place, “right next to the arena, with a movie theater, shopping, restaurants and everything else.”
However, Steve isn’t against the idea of Crooks visiting the FBI office.
“We’re using resources to pinpoint the location more precisely. With the resources we have, we can go down to a depth of about three metres and see what floor you’re on,” he said.
Seraphin, like Steve, is skeptical of the situation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRhOpoEX-ZsSuspended FBI agent Kyle Seraphin analyzes whether Trump shooter was trainedYoutube
“I’m a skeptic,” he says, “and even things I want to believe, things I think are probably true, I always try to disprove them. That makes me a good investigator.”
“Who comes to your house regularly?” he asks Sarah.
“Parents, babysitters, mailmen, Amazon,” she lists.
“UPS, the neighborhood gardener, the person who checks your water meter,” Serafin adds. “The problem is that people you have no relationship with and have never met could be in the advertising ID of the phone of a frequent visitor to your home.”
“They visited the house and work [of Crooks]” Sarah reminds us.
Still, Serafin remains skeptical, saying, “If you live in a small town, there’s a good chance the same Amazon, UPS or postal worker will come to your home or business.”
Moreover, he sees what many call a bogus excuse – “it was too hot on the roof” – as a normal occurrence.
He worked for the FBI and attended many presidential events, and said it was “perfectly reasonable” for agents to seek comfort if they had the option.
“But if you had a choice, would you rather stand outside with this crowd when it’s cold and it’s starting to rain, or sit in your car 50 yards away and keep an eye on them? I’d always stay in my car,” he says.
As for the “blue on blue” situation — that the sniper took so long to shoot Crooks because he was afraid of killing a friendly force — Seraphim says that’s probably true.
“No law enforcement officer, federal agent or officer wants to fire a shot if there’s a chance they could shoot another officer.”
“The reality between police officers is that someone is in the area that they think has a gun, but it’s not the guy they thought it was. That’s the worst-case scenario,” he told Sarah and Steve.
But there’s another element of Crooks’ case that makes Seraphim most skeptical, as you can see in the clip above.
Want to know more about Sara Gonzalez?
To enjoy more of Sarah’s honest news and culture insights, Subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American Dream.
