SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

What happens to the Olympic medal count if we rank per capita?

There has been much debate about what is the most accurate way to count Olympic medals. The IOC has always used gold medals to determine rankings, with the rest being secondary. Meanwhile, there is another school of thought that holds that all medals are worth counting. total It is important for the country to earn money.

To determine the best sporting nations in the world, we count medals. Instead of evaluating the weighting of gold medals or the total number of medals, what if we ranked them based on the number of medals won per capita? This means we can determine the number of medals won per capita, giving us a more accurate picture of how a country stacks up against the rest of the world.

So, without further ado, let’s see what Paris 2024 looks like if we weight the medal counts by nationality. To avoid weird things happening with one small outlier, we’ll limit the total medals required for qualification to a minimum of 10. This way we can look at the rankings in more detail and not be too biased in the opposite direction.

2024 Olympics medals per capita

Rank Country Money Silver bronze total population Medals won
Rank Country Money Silver bronze total population Medals won
1 Australia 15 12 Ten 37 26,000,000 702,703
2 Netherlands 9 Five 6 20 17,700,000 885,000
3 England 12 15 19 48 66,970,000 1,395,208
Four France 13 16 19 48 67,970,000 1,416,042
Five South Korea 11 8 7 26 51,630,000 1,985,769
6 Canada 6 Four 8 18 38,930,000 2,162,778
7 Italy 9 Ten 7 26 58,940,000 2,266,923
8 united states of america twenty four 31 32 87 333,333,300 3,831,414
9 Japan 11 6 12 29 125.1 million 4,313,793
Ten Spain 2 3 Five Ten 47,780,000 4,778,000
11 Germany 8 Five Four 17 83,800,000 4,929,412
12 Brazil 2 Five 6 13 215.3 million 16,561,538
13 China twenty three twenty two 16 61 1,412,000,000 23,147,541
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News