Hello, readers.
It’s hard to overstate how much I’ve changed my views on justice lately. Combining the pressures of family life and observing officials seemingly tolerating violent criminal behavior has shifted my perspective significantly.
What constitutes cruelty and abnormality?
There’s been considerable buzz regarding absent Republican congressmen lately.
One notable case is Congressman Tom Keene from New Jersey, who has been absent from votes and Washington, D.C., for a while. The interesting part? Despite missing crucial votes, he still found time for financial disclosures that hinted at potential insider trading during his absence.
He’s up for election in a district Democrats are targeting, and House Speaker Mike Johnson has come to his defense, citing health concerns. But can I trust that? It doesn’t seem that far-fetched.
This situation led me to express my thoughts in a chat in D.C.: “In my administration, this guy would be on thin ice.”
My brother mentioned that a telltale sign I’m ready to leave the bar is when I start saying “in my system.” He might have a point.
But really, is it that severe? Seeing Keene facing consequences from relentless critics? Is that truly “cruel and abnormal”? What do those terms even mean anymore?
I noticed a memorable tweet earlier.
Deciphering the joke isn’t exactly rocket science. Our justice system seems increasingly lenient toward the most heinous criminals. For instance, two far-left prosecutors in Virginia are under scrutiny for repeatedly giving violent offenders another chance.
Take Marvin Morales Ortez, an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador. First, in 2021, he had a murder charge dismissed despite clear evidence. Then, in 2025, after another violent encounter with police, he was released and ended up committing murder the following day.
Is this surprising? Not anymore. Unfortunately, he’s just one of many cases highlighting a larger trend of leniency in our justice system.
On the topic of violence, you might ask Irina Zalutka about this trend, but tragically, she can’t respond—she died after a brutal attack by a man with a lengthy criminal history.
Only by reflecting on our history can we truly grasp where real cruelty and abnormality lie.
Much of what today seems cruel and unusual was commonplace in the past, fostering societies built on trust and peace while cementing Western ideals for generations.
What’s genuinely cruel and abnormal is letting the worst elements of society unleash violence on innocents. “Power and privilege” narratives are casting a shadow over reality. Just look around; for instance, in college admissions, bright candidates may be overlooked due to the color of their skin. That’s not just abnormal—it’s downright cruel.
This reflects a moral inversion that has crept into our institutions. We’ve seen judges arrested for aiding violent illegal immigrants in evading law enforcement.
That’s not just unusual—it’s beyond absurd.
So, yes, I can say I’ve been quite radicalized. We’re claiming back what is rightfully ours, reconsidering what was once accepted as cruel and abnormal.
Statistics show us that a mere one percent of the populace, typically men, account for a majority of violent crimes. Research indicates that 63% of violent acts are committed by this small fraction.
We need to take action against them—publicly shaming them, imposing strict penalties, even considering life imprisonment for their actions.
To challenge the concepts of cruel and abnormal, perhaps we must embrace a return to certain harsh realities.
Other links
A swarm of biblical bees takes over roads near the White House, sending in lobbyists and think tank experts.
Incredible.
Luke: America’s LGBTQ+ population is reportedly declining as one mayor claims his city is “the gayest” in the world.
That seems a bit excessive.
Jill Biden appears to have had knowledge of events leading up to the October 7th attack before Joe.
What exactly happened? Does Joe even know?
