For decades, I was a faithful Democratic member, and after voting for a straight Democratic ticket in all elections, including the latest elections, I left the Democratic Party.
I was worried about the direction of the party for a while, but I wanted to fix it itself. After being completely driven in the last election, I was convinced that it would do so.
But I was wrong. The Democratic Party seems to have decided to continue the right march to identity politics.
The straw that left the camel came in a democratic response to the protection of women and girls in the 2025 sports law.
This bill prohibits the recipients of federal funding to include men in the exercise program specified for women. The purpose is to ensure the safety and fairness of sports women and girls.
President Joe Biden has all existed in transgender rights and declared it as “the public's civil rights issue.” Certainly, Biden has invited Dylan Marbanny, an adult man who is a woman and sometimes a spare girl to discuss transgender rights.
During the campaign, the swing voter focuses on the past support of Harris's past transgender rights and the support of gender transport surgery provided by taxpayers, as a result of the swing voters from Camala Harris to Donalis Trump. It was shown that he was turning his back. Harris noticed that when Trump was the president, there was a policy of traveling to prisoners to gender and surgery, but in most cases, most of them have been silent.
I was confused by Harris's silence, but I was encouraged that she did not take her to the campaign sord box to express the level of support that Biden had. It was a significant contrast.
I was careful and optimistic that I was probably starting to see this quite a unique phenomenon in light of the growing consensus in how the “gender affirmation” harms the children. The lack of the light between her and the Biden is expected to be a close election between Videnes on this problem, and the people who have taken the boss are alienated. I didn't want to.
However, DEMS was lost, and transgender issues played a role in the loss. Then I was convinced that the Democratic Party would be explicitly receded to relieve the support of the Trans rights at least at least, and people used preferred pronouns. You will not be thrown into a reactional hell to avoid doing.
The boy, I was wrong.
The protection of women and girls in the Sports Law provided a great opportunity to Demes a step away from Biden's support. Who can doubt that it is unfair and not safe for women to play competitive sports with men and boys?
Answer: I have a Democratic member. Their reactions to the bill showed that they were stuck as before, as they were caught by the threat of gender ideology. “Not assigned” -Inbbbeanment.
After the Democratic Party's members, the Democratic members attacked HR 28 as an explicit attack on the identified person. And it wasn't just the team members. They were people like Hakeem Jeffries and Jerry Nadler.
DEMS's main claim: HR 28 is the “predator empowerment” method. In order to keep boys away from the women's sports team, children and young people need to do a looting genital test.
We have different teams for boys and girls of age. And I don't remember those who needed a looted test to make sure that the boy who claims to be a boy is a girl and a girl is a girl.
But do you need genital inspection and “predators' power” to keep the boy from the girl's team now? This is ridiculous. There is no problem to distinguish between boys and girls. If you have a problem, you can consult a school record on gender or birth certificate.
When I first saw DEMS video clips making these accusations on the house floor, I thought they must have been created by artificial intelligence because they looked very real. However, they looked real because they were real.
And these accusations reflect the frequent trans communities. Anyone opposed to Trans -ideology has an unhealthy obsession with genitals. In any case, a democratic position in HR 28 is unclear for women and girls, and in addition to being indifferent and needed. I gave me something.
I have long discussed my views on transgender rights in academic magazines. My bottom line is the liberal multipherist. We should not discriminate identified individuals in housing, education, and employment issues. An excellent employee and a promotion employee should not be rejected because he believes he is a woman. Catholics should be refused to be promoted because the priest believes that the priest is engaged in transplant and turns bread and wine into Jesus' body.
Both Catholic and identified people can choose to believe as they want. In both cases, you can present yourself in a way to reflect your beliefs. But neither can force us to accept their metaphysical beliefs.
Catholics cannot demand the acceptance of transmarization. Also, identified people cannot request that sex exists in the spectrum. Catholics could not celebrate the Trans Orb Stanization ceremony in my house for my opposition, and the identified men demanded the use of women's toilets, changing rooms, shower facilities, and rape crisis centers. You cannot. Or play with a girl/girl's sports team.
We should not discriminate against those who have been transmitted, and we cannot be forced to behave as if we accept it.
However, as far as the Democratic Party is forced to accept religious or mental beliefs, those who are not completely and unusual to accept their beliefs are “transfos”. We make “prejudice” and release us to accusation “We will give power to predators.”
The author, JK Rowling, said in 2019 that people lived, saw, and loved, but refused to recognize that a woman is a woman. , Women should not lose their job. The attack on rolling and the accusation of “Transfobia” were non -stop and serious. Rolling, a British Labor Party supporter, withdrew her support because the workers had a position similar to the Democratic Party.
This is where the “advanced” parties are driving supporters.
So I'm no longer a Democratic member. But I'm not a Republican member. I sincerely praise President Trump's signature of Gender ideology.
However, I am worried about the general rejection of gender incompatibility, and is worried about the reaction that does not focus on women only. Men and women should look, live, and love them, unless other people need to participate. I don't want to see the marriage of homosexuals.
However, I am a woman's private/intimate space and has not identified men. I have to use “good pronouns”, and I don't want to be forced to talk as if I agree with Trans -ideology. And I think that “treatment to affirm gender” for children should be banned.
The Supreme Court is ROEV. Overturn the wade, in my opinion, it is essential for women's rights. I made a secretary from 1982 to 1983 for Judge Sandra Day Okonor. The Republican members appointed by Ronald Reagan formulated her approach to abortion regulations with consent and adopted the court in 1992. The state has allowed abortions to regulate abortions unless the choice is “excessive burden”. The test provided an executable framework to deal with abortion. It is all gone. Selection is no longer a constitutional right of women.
I don't know where it fits. But I don't think I'm alone.
Gary L. Francione is a professor at the University of Latgazs Law School. His latest book is “why beganism is important: the moral value of animals.”
