Ukraine requires one million troops, including allies, nuclear deterrent, and advanced missile batteries, and is not allowed to participate in NATO, to prevent future Russian attacks. , President Volodymyr Zelensky said.
Ukraine abandoned nuclear weapons of the Cold War Legacy in the 1990s and couldn't quickly participate in NATO due to the aftermath of the current war or ceasefire, and tried to get a nuclear bomb again. President said. on monday.
President Ukraine told the British Broadcasting Station Piers Morgan In an interview announced on Tuesday night, from his perspective to lead Ukraine to NATO Alliance would be a very good deal for members. In NATO's membership, he believes that Russia will not invade, but the level of security guarantee needed to keep Moscow carefully will be catastrophically expensive.
Keeping Ukraine safely without NATO means that Ukrainian allies will provide millions of troops, including the “conditional” of the military from the western nations as a reinforcements, to keep the sky clear. In providing money to missile systems, Ukraine means gaining its own nuclear deterrence.
He said, “According to Piers Morgan Show,” NATO needs to maintain a million. [man] The Army, but hundreds of thousands of people we have are not enough, they are attacked and we are not enough … it's a huge money … so I'm the most NATO. I think it's a cheap option. If not NATO, you need to do so [build] This giant army, which has a huge amount of money, means the conditions from our partner, which is definitely a major deterrent package against ruskiss. “
Zelensky said that NATO membership is the future, but even if it has been late for years or decades, that security guarantee is still needed. The President continued: “Which missile? Can you give them a nuclear weapon? Please give them a nuclear weapon … Return nuclear weapons, give a missile system, and your partner helps us for 1 million army funding. Move your unit to a part of our state who wants the situation.
Zelenceky also lamented Ukraine's decision in the 1990s and lamented the decision to abandon a large -scale cold war inherited from the Soviet Union. For them. He told Morgan that Russia would have never invaded Russia if Ukraine remained nuclear power and was sad. “Our nuclear weapons were not exchanged. These were our security guarantee.”
Ukraine should have requested NATO membership in return for abandoning nuclear weapons at the time.
The fierce remarks that require a nuclear warhead as a NATO membership comfort award are not the only time that Ukrainian leaders talked about acquiring weapons in recent months. In fact, in November, even if it was assumed that it was assumed that the Ukrainian internal document was reported to have leaked, even if he did not want to share technology with President Zerensky. Ukrainian scientists are nuclear fleets that can easily build indigenous nuclear weapons from spent fuel rods from considerable citizens in the country.
Last month, Zelenceky said that abandonment of nuclear weapons was “absolutely stupid, illogical and very irresponsible,” and Ukraine would not trust the vague promise of the future. He then, “Almost all depends on the fact that we can safely protect our Ukrainians to protect themselves.
Ukraine, on the other hand, was not ashamed to play against a very realistic nuclear power generation and was threatening to use the weapon repeatedly from the first day. Many of these threats oppose Ukraine's international sponsors as a way to remorse their continuous involvement in conflicts, and on the west side of “escalation”, a fresh transsee that fears the deterrent effect. I follow the policy. It doesn't seem like a special declaration so far.
