Duke Health Freezes $100 Million in Federal Funds Over DEI Practices

Duke Health, part of Duke University in North Carolina, has frozen over $100 million in federal funds in accordance with an executive order from former President Donald Trump that prohibits Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices. This information was revealed in a letter sent to President Vincent Price, with input from board chair Adam Silver, medical school Dean Mary Clotman, and secretaries Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Linda McMahon.

The letter emphasizes the importance of merit in medicine, noting that the ability of a physician can be the difference between life and death. It warns that rejecting merit can lead to dire consequences, especially in the healthcare field.

Kennedy and McMahon indicated they are looking into possible violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the Affordable Care Act, suggesting that Duke Health’s practices could be discriminatory. They argue that such practices render Duke unworthy of federal economic ties.

One senior official confirmed the total amount of frozen funds stands at $108 million. The Civil Rights Act prohibits recipients of federal assistance from discriminating based on race, color, or national origin. Furthermore, the Affordable Care Act expands these protections to include disability, age, and gender.

According to Kennedy and McMahon, allegations suggest that Duke Health has implemented illegal practices in areas such as recruitment, student admissions, scholarships, and employment. They described these actions as “despicable” and indicative of a failure to adhere to merit-based standards.

They stressed that such practices undermine American values of fairness and violate civil rights laws. In healthcare, they argue, this type of preferential treatment erodes trust with patients and can hinder medical advancements.

Despite the freezing of funds, the federal government remains open to future collaborations with Duke, acknowledging the institution’s longstanding commitment to medical excellence. However, Duke will need to reassess its policies regarding racial preferences and take corrective actions to restore its standing.

The letter concludes with a warning that if any misconduct remains unaddressed after six months, or if a stalemate occurs with the Merit and Civil Rights Commission, the federal government may pursue enforcement actions.

Duke University was approached for comments regarding these claims, but responses have not yet been received.