Democrats are looking into the actions of three law firms that have teamed up with President Trump, questioning their decision to provide pro bono work at the Commerce Department.
Among these firms are Paul Weiss, Kirkland & Ellis, and Skadden, who have signed contracts with the White House, possibly influenced by Trump’s threats to limit federal contracts, access to buildings, and even security clearances for staff.
Letters sent Wednesday by Representatives Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), Adam Schiff (California), and Jamie Raskin (Maryland) mark the latest attempt to uncover more about the nature of these agreements following reports of their involvement. They mentioned ongoing trade transactions encouraged by Trump.
Blumenthal noted, “It appears that the work Paul Weiss is doing at the Commerce Department goes beyond the initial scope you described. It’s about supporting veterans, combating anti-Semitism, and ensuring fair judicial practices. There may be ongoing and possibly increasing enforcement of your law firm’s activities.”
Similar letters sent to Kirkland & Ellis expressed that they would be providing free legal aid “to those lacking access to a broader range of services,” while Skadden emphasized their goal of “supporting veterans and civil servants, as well as fighting anti-Semitism.”
“It’s hard to see how there’s no element of coercion from the government,” the lawmakers wrote. They highlighted the Department of Commerce, which comprises 13 divisions, having a proposed $8.6 billion budget for discretionary funding in 2026, qualifying for pro bono services.
As of now, there has been no immediate response to requests for comments from the firms.
Lawmakers have asked for detailed information on all commitments made to the Department of Commerce, including the hours worked and whether any formal agreements were signed.
This inquiry follows earlier statements from lawmakers indicating there was no written deal with the White House, which is an unusual practice in this sphere where contracts are typically clear.
The three law firms have secured contracts worth $40 million, $125 million, and $100 million respectively, being part of nine law firms collectively promising to deliver $1 billion in pro bono legal services in response to Trump’s threats.
While it’s common for law firms to offer reduced services to the government, pro bono work is generally aimed at individuals who can’t afford representation or non-profits supporting specific causes.
During Trump’s first term, many law firms also engaged in pro bono work related to various White House policies, frequently filing injunctions to halt their implementation.
