Issue: Updated Russia-Ukraine peace proposal that placed unrealistic demands on Ukraine.
President Trump, where have you been? You’ve been known as a champion for the downtrodden, a supporter of liberty, and an advocate for common sense.
What’s happening to innocent Ukrainians resembles the atrocities faced by Christians in Africa. At one point, Trump stood up for those affected and even hinted at military intervention if the violence continued.
Now it’s time for him to reaffirm his role as a protector of freedom. Otherwise, he risks reinforcing claims from critics that he’s favoring Russia.
It’s a troubling situation. The core issue hasn’t changed since the war broke out. Russian troops are consolidating on Ukraine’s eastern border, while NATO appears to be amassing forces on its western side as a deterrent.
Western nations really need to choose: will they confront Russia, or let it assert dominance over Ukraine?
Much like how Adolf Hitler forged ahead while Europe hesitated, the Russians will keep pushing until they fully occupy Ukraine.
Special Envoy Steve Witkoff may have a name as a skilled real estate negotiator in New York, but he’s not exactly seen as a strong advocate for democracy. His acceptance of Putin’s narrative about Ukraine almost cost significant concessions.
Thank goodness for Marco Rubio, who seems to have reevaluated his stance and halted what could’ve been a disastrous shift in policy toward Moscow.
Any reasonable peace deal should involve the complete withdrawal of Russian forces from areas they occupied in 2014, along with the return of all Ukrainian citizens.
Russia has committed numerous war crimes—murder, torture, rape, kidnapping, and the use of chemical weapons against civilians. These tactics are reminiscent of Nazi Germany.
If Putin retains even a tiny portion of Ukrainian territory, it’ll be a victory for him.
Ukrainian President Zelenskiy believes the U.S. can be trusted. Meanwhile, as someone who’s supported Trump three times, I’ve noticed a shift in the administration’s approach to supplying intelligence and arms to Europe, which is supposed to assist Ukraine. What has actually changed?
It feels like there’s an agenda to rescue Putin from a dire economic situation. Is Trump planning something like a resort on the Black Sea?
Winston Churchill once remarked that “War is primarily a catalog of failures,” and that seems particularly relevant in the current Ukraine-Russia conflict.
It’s unacceptable to prolong this war, especially given the risk of escalation throughout Europe. Mr. Zelenskiy and supporters of the war need to face a difficult truth: Ukraine can’t ultimately win, and the U.S. won’t provide endless backing.
The harsh reality is that a less-than-ideal peace might be the only feasible path forward.
The many Ukrainians who’ve fought valiantly to defend their country deserve substantial recognition. Their bravery shouldn’t be disregarded for the sake of convenience.
Backing Ukraine goes beyond strategy; it’s a moral responsibility. Turning our backs now would send a message that democracy can be coerced into submission—an image that should not represent America.
As someone firmly in the MAGA camp, I must say this feels different. After denouncing the casualties from Putin’s misguided actions in Ukraine, Trump now seems to be yielding to the Russian leader, reminiscent of Neville Chamberlain’s approach to “modern peace.” We all know the disaster that followed that mindset.
Have thoughts on today’s story? Send your opinions (including your full name and city) to letters@nypost.com. Letters may be edited for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
