SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

US attack leader in the Caribbean thought survivors were still involved in drug trafficking

US attack leader in the Caribbean thought survivors were still involved in drug trafficking

The U.S. military commander involved in the September 2 strike on a suspected drug-smuggling ship in the Caribbean is set to inform lawmakers that he sanctioned further attacks based on his belief that two survivors were looking to resume their trafficking activities. According to a report, Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley will address these matters in a confidential briefing, aiming to counter arguments from legal experts who suggest that the killing of the two survivors might be classified as a war crime.

As stated by two defense officials, Bradley’s legal team contends that the survivors were attempting to continue drug trafficking, which rendered both them and their damaged vessel justifiable targets. The officials highlighted that part of Bradley’s rationale was the presence of an “enemy” ship nearby and indications that the survivors were communicating with additional members of their drug operation.

The September 2 attack marked the Trump administration’s initial military action against a suspected drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean. It is notably the only documented case where a survivor was targeted and killed during a pursuit operation.

In mid-October, defense officials reported that the Coast Guard rescued two individuals from another attack on a submarine when they were deemed unfit for duty. The White House announced that Army Secretary Pete Hegseth authorized this second strike, which was directed by Bradley. At that time, Bradley served as the commander of Joint Special Operations Command under U.S. Special Operations Command.

Hegseth publicly expressed his strong support for Admiral Bradley, declaring him an American hero and backing the decisions made during the September 2 mission. He reiterated his confidence in Bradley’s judgment during subsequent military operations.

Hegseth stated, “Admiral Bradley ultimately made the right decision to sink the boat and eliminate the threat.” Given the complexities surrounding military engagement and legal implications, it will be interesting to see how the discussions unfold with legislators.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News