The idea of achieving the American dream—owning a home and having a stable job—feels increasingly out of reach for many. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, there’s a significant housing shortage of around 4.7 million units. Looking ahead to 2025, home prices are expected to soar, wages could take a dip, and unemployment may rise, especially among younger individuals and those in blue-collar roles. Moreover, the American Society of Civil Engineers has given the nation’s infrastructure a “D” grade across nearly all categories. Our airports are aging, bridges are in disrepair, housing costs are climbing, and public transport is not only outdated but also unsafe. The way forward could lie in adopting a smart growth model focusing on walkable neighborhoods, efficient public transport, modern infrastructure, and preservation of natural spaces. This approach is something that resonates across political lines.
Even though my political leanings are quite progressive, I think we can find common ground with a strategic approach to growth. Traditionally, conservatives prioritize reducing debt and often resort to austerity measures, which come with their own set of challenges. Historically, such cuts have led to reduced economic activity and increased unemployment. When growth stalls, profits tend to dip, which is not ideal for anyone. States may try cutting social programs, yet they often end up spending more on unemployment benefits. On a brighter note, smart growth can also attract businesses—companies prefer locations with dependable transport, modern infrastructure, and strong educational systems. Unfortunately, austerity measures frequently end up undermining these vital areas. A prominent example is the situation in Detroit back in 2013, which saw public services slashed as a reaction to a financial crisis. This led to sluggish police response times and prompted many residents to flee for various reasons, including infrastructure failures.
I believe in sensible regulation across different sectors, but I’m against wasteful rules that hinder necessary development. This divide is where I sometimes find myself at odds with fellow progressives. Yes, we need to be environmentally conscious in our building practices, but let’s not take decades to ensure safety—months should suffice. Modern transport systems can improve traffic and reduce emissions significantly. Take California’s high-speed rail project, which was initiated in the 1980s and aimed for operation by 2020. Here we are in 2025, and nothing has materialized; costs have tripled for a smaller project than initially envisioned due to regulatory hurdles. Regulations are essential for community protection, but they shouldn’t indefinitely stall development, especially when backed by popular vote.
Meanwhile, other countries are pulling ahead because they are investing in their infrastructure and smart growth initiatives. China, for instance, boasts the world’s largest high-speed rail network. While many criticize it for pollution, it’s not a complete picture—China emits less CO2 per person than the U.S. A contributing factor is the existence of modern public transit there, along with an improved power grid and more renewable energy sources. This means that Chinese firms are leading in the electric vehicle market. Their airports function efficiently, unlike many in the U.S. Additionally, modern subways shorten commute times for workers, enhancing productivity and reducing absenteeism.
Looking ahead, we need to develop “America First” strategies that prioritize building affordable housing, creating jobs, and enhancing environmental conditions. We could rejuvenate cities like Detroit, which has thousands of vacant homes, or Baltimore, grappling with numerous vacant buildings and lots. These efforts could lead to job creation and help stabilize housing costs. Repairing existing infrastructure is typically more cost-effective than constructing entirely new systems. Reliable public transit is crucial for working-class individuals trying to reach jobs more efficiently. Environmental advocates can feel reassured; urban development minimizes disruption to wildlife and farm areas.
It’s important we don’t lock ourselves into extended mortgage debt when we could simply be building houses. Current leadership seems adept at creating luxury properties abroad, but we need true home builders focused on American families.
