Michael Knowles Interviews Clavicle: A Look at Controversial Ideas
Recently, Michael Knowles from the Daily Wire had an interview with a young livestreamer known as “Clavicle.” This conversation kind of highlighted what’s off about the whole concept of “No Enemies to Your Right.” Before this, I had no clue who Clavicle was. His main point seems to be that we should focus on our looks, which some in online circles refer to as “lookmaxing.” And honestly, it’s hard to miss the clavicle.
There was even a mention of an incident where he reportedly ran over a stalker with a Cybertruck. A bit wild, right?
Days before he allegedly hit a stalker with his Cybertruck, Luxmax livestreamer Mr. Collarbone sat down to watch the latest episode of “Michael &.”
Read the full conversation here: pic.twitter.com/NM0faMj4Li
— Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) December 27, 2025
There’s a part where Clavicle talks about injuring himself to enhance his appearance. It’s pretty shocking.
@michaeljknowles Grill the collarbone with “bone crusher”:
MK: “Do you punch yourself in the face?”
Clavicle: “Yes…I used to use a hammer, but my parents came into the bathroom and took the hammer away.”
MK: “Are there any downsides to hitting someone in the head with a hammer?” pic.twitter.com/iqpX2mVWCD
— Michael Knowles Show (@MKnowlesShow) December 28, 2025
He also had some opinions about why he thinks some celebrities, like Sidney Sweeney, are unattractive. And he seems to imagine Gavin Newsom winning against J.D. Vance in an upcoming presidential race, mainly because of looks. It’s kind of bizarre how much weight he puts on appearances.
Honestly, I don’t have an issue with Knowles or his choice to interview Clavicle. But I wonder if Knowles truly aligns with many of Clavicle’s views, or if he’s just trying to get attention. Sometimes it’s unclear what the intent is.
This interview really showed how absurd the idea of “there are no enemies to your right” can be. To give some context, there are folks on the mainstream right who believe in not critiquing younger right-wing figures, like Nick Fuentes, because they think the left poses a bigger threat. Their logic is that we should focus our anger on the left instead of the fringe elements online. It’s odd to treat these individuals as if they belong in the larger Republican tent.
But, frankly, these younger influencers often seem to thrive on chaos. They love creating discord online without caring for the consequences. Thinking you can strike a deal with them is, well, misguided. If you extend an olive branch, they’ll likely just turn around and mock you. They don’t have any real stake in political discussions.
The Republican Party seems to have devolved into an inauthentic spectacle. Trying to embrace or defend these Zoomer influencers is only going to make things worse. It no longer feels edgy or cool; it’s just plain silly.
