Trilateral Talks Resumed in Abu Dhabi
Ukraine, Russia, and the United States have resumed their trilateral discussions in Abu Dhabi, though the fundamental positions of each side, which have hindered previous negotiations, remain largely unchanged.
On Wednesday morning, delegations convened in the United Arab Emirates for this new round of peace talks concerning the Ukraine conflict. The last round took place in January, and while the discussions then were deemed constructive by all parties, no significant breakthroughs were announced publicly.
Both the United States and Ukraine have indicated that meaningful resolutions are unlikely until there’s an actual summit between Ukraine and Russia. Without involvement at the highest level, they argue that any discussion could lack the necessary authority to move forward effectively. Still, this meeting is noteworthy as it represents the first time in years that the primary adversaries have interacted directly, potentially setting the stage for future high-level conversations.
However, progress seems poised to be incremental at best. Both sides have consistently ignored the so-called “red lines” they claim to uphold, and accusations toward each other have been particularly harsh. For instance, Russia is firmly demanding that Ukraine relinquish all territories in the east, including areas it hasn’t successfully seized, which Kyiv is unlikely to accept. On the flip side, Ukraine is adamant about securing solid guarantees from the West, specifically from the U.S., but NATO appears cautious, knowing the potential ramifications in Eastern Europe.
Additionally, Ukraine asserts that recent heavy airstrikes from Russia demonstrate a lack of genuine interest in peace negotiations, depicting these strikes as preparations for further assaults following a cold ceasefire. In fact, Ukraine reported that the latest airstrikes were the most intense in over a year, launching over 70 missiles aimed at its energy infrastructure.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy criticized Russia for what he views as a blatant disregard for the temporary truce, saying, “Either Russia believes there are only four middle days in the week or it’s banking on conflict, particularly during the coldest days of winter… This latest attack is a direct violation of what was discussed with the U.S., and there has to be repercussions.”
Hours before the negotiations, Russia conducted another offensive, with claims from Odesa’s governor about a significant drone strike. Russia accused Ukraine of launching its own attacks that damaged infrastructure in Belgorod and Bryansk.
As the talks began, Ukrainian official Rustem Umerov confirmed their continuation, stating: “The negotiation process is taking place in a tripartite format. Different groups will work on specific areas, and then we’ll synchronize our positions together.” He mentioned that they are following President Zelenskiy’s directive to seek a fair and lasting peace, with updates planned for the heads of state on progress throughout the process.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin acknowledged the negotiations but insisted that Ukraine must align with its demands. Dmitry Peskov, a spokesperson for President Vladimir Putin, indicated that Russia’s military operations would persist until Ukraine makes an appropriate decision.
Furthermore, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova emphasized Russia’s stance on the involvement of foreign troops, particularly from Europe, stating that such a presence under any flag is a threat to Russia’s security and that they would consider these forces legitimate military targets.
Over the past year, Russia has reiterated these points to deter NATO, the U.S., and European nations from deploying troops in Ukraine post-ceasefire. Britain and France have shown the strongest support, recently signing a Declaration of Intent on troop deployment.
This agreement supposedly establishes a legal framework for British, French, and other partner forces to operate within Ukraine, helping to safeguard its air and coastal spaces, as well as to bolster the country’s military capabilities moving forward, according to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
In response to these developments, President Zelenskiy appears somewhat relaxed but emphasizes that he is looking for either robust U.S. security guarantees against potential future invasions from Russia or the establishment of an independent nuclear deterrent for Ukraine, expressing that this is the level of assurance his country truly needs.




