Ghislaine Maxwell’s Funding Ties Surfaces
In an attempt to tackle misinformation, I won’t link to dubious sources, but here’s what you need to know.
Imagine sitting in a doctor’s office while a neurologist tells you your child has a rare condition—a complication from measles that leads to severe brain deterioration. There’s the grim reality that treatments exist but no cure. Your son will, over time, lose his mental abilities and face painful seizures, likely succumbing in a few years. You picture his youthful spirit—the way he chose his glasses and hairstyle—and the heartache in your family’s eyes when they receive the news. There’s just no way to prepare for such sorrow, and you understand that healing is impossible.
Strangely, the published version of this grief didn’t have a fitting tone.
This narrative was crafted as if it were a personal account by Elizabeth Brunig from Atlantic, which raises eyebrows.
But hold on.
That’s not true.
It’s entirely fabricated.
Many people, initially sympathetic to Brunig, backtracked once questioned by the media. Afterward, Atlantic got defensive, adding an editor’s note stating the article was based on interviews, including insights from doctors treating measles patients.
In essence, this piece is pure fiction.
It’s clear that the agenda isn’t just about critiquing political issues but seems to serve the interests of pharmaceutical companies, channeling pity to rally support for their narratives. The outrage feels curated for sensationalism.
Yet, instead of challenging their own missteps, sources like the Washington Post compounded their issues. Over 3,000 words of deception—what the article has been called—were fed to the readers.
“Reported Fiction,” they say. It sounds almost respectable, right?
But what does that even mean? It opens a door for anyone to “report” anything, regardless of its truthfulness.
Where are the standard-bearers of journalistic integrity? Remember Stephen Glass? He should offer some apologies for his misdeeds.
Last night, I found myself immersed in a classic movie. Can you picture “reported fiction” now?
You’re in a desperate battle, ordered to seize a hill while your comrades suffer.
Or in a thrilling space mission, battling through enemy forces at a critical moment.
You’re at your ex-wife’s festive gathering when chaos erupts.
None of that would be acceptable.
Reputable news organizations don’t engage in this behavior.
If they did, clarity should be provided right away.
Elizabeth Brunig needs to be held accountable. Any editor supporting such practices should face consequences—but likely won’t. Because, let’s face it, fostering misinformation seems to be the goal for some media outlets.
Understanding this makes you question every piece that could be crafted dishonestly.
