According to traditional news networks, social media platforms, various deep state actors, and other corrupt organizations, the 2020 election was the safest and most secure in history, and anyone who questions Joe Biden’s victory should not It is said that he was an eccentric “election denier.”
That has been the dominant narrative for the past three years, and it has created a chilling effect, causing many to refrain from looking deeper into whether the 2020 election was really as safe and secure as it was said to be. became.
The 50 states have an obligation to ensure that their voting systems are as secure as possible. There is still time to make the necessary changes.
In reality, the 2020 election was most likely marred by widespread mail-in voting fraud. To make matters worse, massive mail-in voting fraud almost certainly tilted the election in Joe Biden’s favor.
In other words, had widespread mail-in voting fraud been stopped in the 2020 election, Donald Trump would have won the Electoral College and been re-elected to a second term.
At this point, you may be wondering how I can be so sure that the 2020 election was tainted by mail-in voting fraud. The answer is simple. Because the voters say so.
In late 2023, the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Report conducted a brief survey to gauge the extent of voter fraud in the 2020 election. We asked 1,085 voters who participated in the 2020 election about their voting behavior three years ago. Surprisingly, the results showed at least the following: One in five mail-in voters were admitted. Voter fraud occurred in the 2020 election.
Our findings raise concerns in the media and especially among those who doubt the 2020 election is completely unsafe due to questionable changes to voting rules unconstitutionally imposed by state officials under the cover of COVID-19. And it caused quite a stir.
Immediately after the poll was released, former President Trump called it “the most important poll released in the last 20 years” and “the biggest news of the year.”
Ultimately, we began to wonder if we could apply our poll results to publicly available election data to determine whether mail-in voting fraud affected the election outcome. This was no easy task.
Extensive analysis combining raw survey data provided by Rasmussen with other reliable state-based sources that track mail-in voting totals shows that mail-in voting fraud has been reported in all six key battleground states. concluded that it almost certainly changed the outcome of the 2020 election. .
This is all explained in detail in the Heartland Institute’s latest policy study, aptly titled:Who really won the 2020 election?(Spoiler alert: It’s not Joe Biden.)
Here are some of the main takeaways.
Further analysis of Rasmussen’s survey data reveals that more than one in four mail-in voters (28.2% to be exact) admitted to committing at least one type of election fraud in the 2020 election. I did.
Under multiple scenarios that account for varying rates of mail-in ballot fraud, our results show that had the fraudulent mail-in ballots not been counted, Trump would have won the electorate in the 2020 election. It shows that it will be.
Even if the level of fraud detected in the Hartland/Rasmussen investigation vastly exaggerated mail-in voting fraud, Trump still likely would have won the 2020 election.
According to official 2020 election results, Biden defeated Trump in the Electoral College by a margin of 306 to 232. The national vote count was similarly lopsided, with Biden receiving about 81 million votes to Trump’s 74 million.
In nearly every hypothetical scenario we presented, Mr. Trump would have won enough electoral votes to securely defeat Mr. Biden.
But the 2020 election, like recent national elections, was ultimately decided in battleground states.
In 2020, Biden won each of the six battleground states by fewer than 20,000 votes, but the margin was narrow based on the overall vote count.
But here’s the problem. We estimate mail-in voter fraud in six key battleground states using state-specific mail-in voter data and accounting for various fraud rates (ranging from the 28% level to the 28% level). , in the 1% range), the electoral vote changed significantly.
In nearly every hypothetical scenario we presented, Mr. Trump would have won enough electoral votes to securely defeat Mr. Biden. In other words, Biden’s Electoral College victory was predicated on narrow margins in all six battleground states, even though they appear to be wide margins.
We learned that each of the six battleground states changed election rules in the months leading up to the 2020 election to allow for mass mail-in voting based on inaccurate state voter registration rolls. I know this as a fact. Some of these states also make it easier for mail-in voting fraud to occur by eliminating common-sense guardrails like signature verification and allowing questionable election practices like ballot harvesting. I also know that.
It stands to reason, then, that the unprecedented last-minute changes to voting procedures likely resulted in a large number of fraudulent ballots being counted. It’s also no surprise that widespread mail-in voting fraud in the 2020 election unfairly benefited Joe Biden, given that Joe Biden received more than twice as many mail-in votes as Trump. .
Considering all these factors, it seems clear that Biden’s victory in 2020 was aided and abetted by widespread mail-in voting fraud. But as they say, what’s done is done. There’s no point crying over spilled milk or questionable elections.
But with less than nine months until the 2024 presidential election, we need to make sure this never happens again. The 50 states have an obligation to ensure that their voting systems are as secure as possible. There is still time to make the necessary changes.
Will enough states do the right thing in the future, or will the archaic American tradition of free and fair elections, like so many other things in today’s upside-down world, be a relic of the past? ?
