The White House is reportedly “extremely outraged” by the incident. new york times For publishing an article about President Joe Biden’s age.
busy In collaboration with the Reuters Institute for Journalism, new york times Publisher AG Sulzberger said he had been told by the White House that the administration was “very upset” about reports about Biden’s age. However, Sulzberger stressed that the outlet will continue to provide fair coverage of both presidential candidates.
“We will continue to fully and fairly cover not just Donald Trump, but President Joe Biden,” Sulzberger said.
“He is a historically unpopular incumbent and the oldest person to hold the job. We have reported extensively on both of these realities, and the White House is very upset about this. ” he added.
Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks after meeting with members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters at his headquarters in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2024. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
However, Sulzberger clarified: times does not view Biden’s age with the same level of caution as former President Donald Trump’s “five trials.”
“I’m not saying this is the same as Mr. Trump’s five trials or that they’re evenly matched,” Sulzberger said in an interview. “They’re different. But they’re both true, and the public needs to know both. And if you’re going to overhype one team or downplay the other, you’re not going to be able to do it for the long term.” There’s no reason for any team to trust you.”
Reports and concerns about Biden’s age came to the mainstream this month with the release of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report showing the president suffers from cognitive decline, affecting his memory. On this basis, it recommended that Mr. Xu not be prosecuted for “intentionally” retaining his confidential documents. As Breitbart News reported:
The report said the investigation “revealed evidence that President Biden knowingly retained and disclosed classified materials after becoming vice president and while a civilian.” It is said that guilt has not been determined.
However, Mr. Hsu’s assessment that Mr. Biden’s memory was “severely limited” also influenced the decision not to prosecute.
“We also believe that at trial Mr. Biden will likely appear before the jury as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory, just as he was when we interviewed him,” the report said. ing. “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone that many jurors would want to clear reasonable doubt to.”
“It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict a former president, who was already in his 80s, on serious felonies that required intentional insanity.”
Mr. Xu’s report included numerous examples and assessments of Mr. Biden’s declining mental capacity and memory, stating: Biden’s memory also appeared to have significant limitations. ”
Shockingly, the report states, “He did not remember when his son Beau died, even years later.”
Recent ABC News/Ipsos polls Indicated An overwhelming majority of Americans believe Biden is too old to serve another term.
President Joe Biden speaks about the death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on Friday, February 16, 2024 in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Sources later confirmed that ABC News And that new york times Biden lawyers Ed Siskel and Bob Bauer wrote “in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland that details of the report regarding the president’s recollections during interviews with investigators were “openly, clearly, blatantly disclosed to the Department of Justice. “This is a violation of our policies and practices.”
There are four people who have confirmed correspondence with him. new york times. According to ABC News:
A senior Justice Department official, Bradley Weinsheimer, said in a statement the following day, “The identified language was not provided with the intent to criticize or disparage the president, and therefore is not unfair or unfairly prejudicial. , is provided to explain Special Counsel Ho’s conclusions regarding the President’s mental state in the possession and retention of classified information.”
Following the release of Herr’s report, Siskel and Bauer responded to Weinsheimer’s letter saying they “fundamentally disagree.” [his] It assessed that the comments contained in Special Counsel Heo’s report were consistent with the department’s policies and practices. ”
“They never were,” they declared.
Director Paul Roland Bois award-winning feature film, exampleYou can watch it for free. YouTube or Tubi. “Better than Flower Moon’s killer.” Mark Judge wrote. “I’ve never seen a story like this before.” Christian Toto wrote. High quality, ad-free streams are also available for purchase at: google play or Vimeo On Demand. Follow him on Twitter @prolandfilms or instagram @prolandfilms.
