Wyoming GOP sides with the health cartel to keep parents in the dark

Wyoming Republicans recently blocked an effort to ban chemical castration of minors. Naturally, lawmakers want to give parents limited access to their children’s medical records. In this way, state officials will be free to promote vaccination of minors and anything else that hides the spirit of the age behind a medical cloak.

This is an unfortunate situation in what is supposed to be the most conservative state in the country.

Anthony Fauci’s worldview is thriving in the Cowboy State.

Last spring, Wyoming parents in Banner Health System in Natrona County, where Casper is the county seat, received a startling notice. They were told that they would no longer be able to access their children’s online health records after their 12th birthday.parents Locked out of patient portal. The hospital also reserved the right to withhold other information if requested.

Given the insidious trend of grooming children and keeping parents in the dark, both in the context of education and health care, state Rep. Janet Ward (R-Casper) called on Mr. Banner to explain. She was told that state law says children 12 and older can receive smoking cessation treatment without parental consent. The problem was that health care providers were using that fairly narrow provision as an excuse to block treatment. all access to all Record online.

It’s not hard to imagine all sorts of “public health” agendas that medical cartels might want to protect from parents, from abortion and castration to forced vaccinations.

At the first opportunity, Ward introduced: HB44 Repeal the part of the law that prevents parents from knowing about smoking cessation treatment. It also ensured that vaccinations and treatments for minors without parental consent would be categorically illegal. The bill failed in a 5-4 vote in the state House Occupational Health Committee, which included four Republicans in addition to the only Democrat on the committee to intentionally hide medical records from parents.

Ward’s motion to reassign the bill to another committee failed by one vote, with Chairman Albert Somers siding with the medical cartels. This is in the Legislature, which has a 57-5 Republican majority.

Republicans are against parental choice.

I was looking at the comments of some of the committee members, wondering what excuse the Republicans would give for such a despicable vote. Their excuses were even more disturbing than the vote itself. In fact, the very reason you and I want to strengthen the right of parents to their children’s health care – to avoid further coronavirus fascism and forced government medical experimentation – is the very reason why they want to strengthen the right of parents to their children’s health care. That’s why we want to maintain state control over records and keep parents in custody. dark.

“I’m also concerned, listening to experts, that this could have some impact in a public health emergency that we haven’t really thought about.” lost in thought Representative Ken Clouston, one of the opponents of the bill.

What kind of “public health emergency,” in Clouston’s estimation, would create a need for confidentiality to protect children’s medical records from their parents? And who are the experts he cites? The same people who think lockdowns, masks, and mRNA are “safe and effective”? Vaccinations of children without parental consent? The same people who believe in forced experiments?

Apparently so. Rep. Kevin O’Hearn, also from Natrona County, basically argued that sometimes the state and health bureaucrats know what’s best for children better than you.

“We’ve heard from some experts that some parents aren’t as involved with their children as they should be. … Some parents need more skills than they actually have.” O’Hearn said In a shockingly candid moment.

Yes, it’s as bad as it sounds. These Republicans actually believe the states know better, so they don’t keep secrets from parents. You don’t have to imagine what kind of medical problems they have in mind.

Parental consent is at risk

new york is moving Allowing children to be vaccinated without parental consent.Washington DC, San Francisco already Allow minors to receive coronavirus vaccinations without their parents’ knowledge. Liberals see parents as having to deal with their children and their efforts to prepare them intellectually, emotionally, and now with gender dysphoria, mass vaccinations, and even physical obstacles. .

This is a disturbing proposal from a Republican who doesn’t even know that women should keep their medical records safe from their parents.

This is particularly problematic in school-based clinics. Recently, the C.D.C. The whole school, whole community, whole child agendais sending federal grants to states to establish permanent comprehensive health clinics in schools. What do you think the purpose is? Who in their right mind would think that the CDC, which makes decisions about COVID-19 and transgenderism, has your child’s best interests at heart?

A troubling pattern is emerging.The same Republicans voted last year. lower the bill Remove CDC influence from Wyoming. They want to subject your child to the whims of the Centers for Disease Control, and they want to defeat all parental resistance. Silencing mom and dad is the first step.

Wyoming Republican leaders refused to support Chloe’s law banning chemical castration, opting instead for a weaker bill that only bans physical castration. This bill was full of exceptions and was ineffective.

Last week, 20 Republicans joined Democrats to deny the two-thirds conservative majority required for passage. HB50a woman would be legally defined as… woman. The three Republican committee members who voted against the parental rights bill (Forrest Chadwick, Dan Zwonitzer, and Mike Yin) also voted against the What It Means to Be a Woman Act.same member I just voted against it. Proposed budget amendment to cut funding for gender studies at the University of Wyoming.

This is a disturbing proposal from a Republican who doesn’t even know that women should keep their medical records safe from their parents.

The cruel irony of those foisting medical secrets on parents under the guise of a public health emergency is that last week, the very same lawmakers warned that governors must obtain consent from the Legislature before declaring such emergencies. They rejected a bill that would have made it mandatory to do just that.