A prominent molecular biologist has published a ‘definitive shot’ showing that COVID-19 not only originated from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, but was also manipulated by researchers there. I warned you about the evidence.
Richard H. Ebrightis a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, a member of the Rutgers Board of Trustees, professor of chemistry and chemical biology, and laboratory director of the Waksman Institute for Microbiology.Harvard University Junior Fellow earned He received the Searle Scholar Award, was named a Johnson & Johnson Discovery Research Fellow, received the Walter J. Johnson Award, was named a Fellow of the Infectious Disease Society of America, and received the National Institutes of Health MERIT Award. did.
Mr. Ebright also served on the National Institutes of Health Molecular Biology Research Section and the National Institutes of Health Special Emphasis Committee.
He has over 175 publications and over 40 issued and pending patents.
Ebright is also an outspoken critic of the irrefutable narrative about the origins of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus. Ebright noted that the 2018 document points to “conclusive evidence” that the coronavirus was manipulated by researchers in a Chinese lab.
Ebright focuses on a March 2018 grant proposal for an experiment called “Project DEFUSE.”
American and Chinese virologists lobbied to receive $14 million Grant from the Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, for funding to engineer bat viruses related to SARS-CoV-1 to study how they jump to human infection. .
by wall street journal“The Project DEFUSE proposal specifies that the infectivity of the virus is enhanced by inserting a genetic element known as a furin cleavage site into the virus.Depending on the starting virus, this protocol could be 2, which causes the novel coronavirus infection with a characteristic furin cleavage site.”
The proposal was supported by Chinese bat researcher Zheng Lishi, EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, and a University of North Carolina professor who reportedly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “dangerous bat virus research” in 2015. Ralph Barrick was involved.
Explanation “This proposal outlines a joint project between Barrick’s UNC Institute and a team led by WIV Senior Researcher Zhengli Shi, a famous ‘bat lady’ at the Wuhan Institute. The proposal was drafted under the supervision of Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance. It funneled much-anticipated grants to researchers, and the recipient was the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). ”
This proposal was ultimately rejected by DARPA.
However, Project DEFUSE may have been funded by the Chinese government and carried out by researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
of washington times “Nonetheless, speculation continues that the research was undertaken with support from the Chinese government. Project DEFUSE also engineered a ‘human-specific cleavage site’ into the bat coronavirus spike protein. It suggests changes to be introduced. Notably, these techniques are similar to those that some biologists speculate may have played a role in creating the coronavirus that caused the global health crisis. . ”
Nicholas Wade, a former science editor at the New York Times, told the Journal: “Viruses created according to the DEFUSE protocol were available between August and November 2019, when the coronavirus outbreak began.” “This could be the cause.” The otherwise inexplicable timing of the pandemic and its location. ”
Dr Philippa Lentzos, Associate Professor of Science and International Security at King’s College London, also appealed to the world to accept that the coronavirus pandemic may have originated from the work of scientists. .
“We have to accept the fact that the pandemic may have started from a research-related event,” Rentzos said. Said In a speech at the United Nations.
“Are we ever going to figure it out? In my opinion, it’s very unlikely that we’ll ever figure it out,” she said. “We need to do better in the future. There will be more ambiguous events.”
“There will be an outbreak, but we don’t know if it’s natural, intentional or accidental. As an international community, we need to find a way to investigate that,” Rentzos warned. We need to acknowledge that this is a possibility, so how should you respond? ”
As Blaze News reported on Saturday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released new guidelines regarding COVID-19 that are in stark contrast to previous recommendations by health agencies.
The CDC now says people who test positive for COVID-19 do not need to isolate from others for at least five days, and recommends treating the coronavirus like the flu and gathering outdoors to prevent getting sick. did.
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
