Just as the risks of COVID mRNA vaccines were beginning to be fully evaluated, the FDA approved Moderna’s upcoming mRNA vaccine. RRespiratory syncytial virusWithout a public hearingRegulators are also in discussion with mRNA manufacturers, compounding avian flu vaccinations.
Why are they so bold as touting their next poison when the scale of the disaster caused by their first invention is not yet clear? The answer is simple: incompetent Republicans.
It should be clear by now that mRNA should be banned outright, yet here we are approving a whole new injection made from this poison.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FDA approved including GSK and Pfizer’s RSV vaccine last year, and the Pfizer vaccine for pregnant women. Despite the strong signal It is supposed to be effective in preventing premature births and neonatal deaths. At least the CDC and FDA held advisory meetings with “expert” committees before doing so. Yet Moderna’s mRNA RSV vaccine for seniors was quietly approved last week without any public hearings. And guess what? You can trust that the vaccine is 83.7% effective and “risk-free”!
Even if we take the 83.7% efficacy claim at face value, how severely could older adults become affected by a virus that primarily affects infants? Additionally, a public hearing would allow for scrutiny of data from Moderna’s Phase 3 clinical trial, which showed that: 200 adverse events Additionally, for every mild RSV disease prevented, 10 serious side effects are expected to occur. Moderna’s figures show that for every RSV disease prevented, vaccination is associated with 200 side effects, 10 of which are serious. Across trial participants, vaccinated people experienced 46 fewer RSV cases, but experienced 10,156 side effects, of which 455 were rated grade 3 or higher.
The benefits are likely illusory: Dr. Dan Stock, a functional medicine specialist and family physician in Indiana, explained to me that the RSV vaccine from the 1960s had a “negative effect” that made kids sicker, but that didn’t happen until the second season.
“It’s likely that the Moderna RSV vaccine will be more difficult to avoid losing efficacy than previous RSV vaccines, and the data suggests that’s the case,” Stock said.
“The first signs are what always happens when you make a vaccine for a rapidly changing RNA virus that only causes disease in immunocompromised people,” he explained. “The vaccine triggers a memorized response, and then little mutations develop quickly that learn to evade that response, and the virus that learned to fight in one way responds in the old way to the new variant.”
“Eventually, usually in the second year, one variant learns to benefit from a learned response of your defective immune system, making you worse than if you were exposed to the new variant in an unvaccinated state,” Stock said.
This is called antibody-dependent enhancement, and it happens through multiple mechanisms, Stock explained. “The other two RSV vaccines on the market have already shown declining efficacy about 18 months into the studies,” Stock said.
This is what we saw with the COVID vaccine, so of course the RSV vaccine will be at least as bad, given history. It should be clear by now that mRNA vaccines should be banned outright, and yet we approve a whole new vaccine made from this poison.
The evidence is already out Swedish study mRNA likely converts to DNA, since it was found to be incorporated into the DNA of liver cells within 6 hours. Will Republicans not only refuse to fund a COVID mRNA vaccine, but completely ignore the FDA’s foray into RSV for seniors who have already received countless COVID vaccinations?
At a House coronavirus oversight subcommittee hearing on Monday, not a single Republican was present, including Dr. Anthony Fauci. Raised the issue Millions of people have died or been injured in vaccine-related cases, among them millions of deaths and injuries. Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) thanked Dr. Fauci for the vaccines that “saved millions of lives.”
Vaccination is widely believed to prevent severe disease, but there was no evidence of this when COVID-19 was still deadly.
Every week new studies are published showing the devastating damage caused by the first series of mRNA injections.
new British Medical Journal Study Deaths in 47 countries, mostly in Europe and the United States found In 2021, with the release of the vaccine, excess deaths surged, surpassing the number of excess deaths in 2020, the first year of the pandemic without a vaccine.
Perhaps Wenstrup should read the academic literature from the most prestigious medical institutions in his home state of Ohio. found The company said that after monitoring 47,500 employees in the first half of 2024, vaccinated people were 46% more likely to be infected with COVID-19 than unvaccinated people. Those who received three doses of the vaccine were 95% more likely to be infected than those who refused to be vaccinated. Those who received three or more doses were a staggering 151% more likely to be infected.
You’d think the “more shots, more infections” phenomenon during the pandemic would have been limited to mild cases, but a new study from Ohio State University finds that COVID death rates are much higher among supposedly vaccinated people. studyThe study, published in Frontiers in Immunology, tracked the mortality rates of 23 vaccinated and 89 unvaccinated patients who presented to OSU with severe COVID-19. Surprisingly (or not), 70% of vaccinated patients died compared with 37% of unvaccinated patients.
Although the sample size is small, the results are of high level of marginal importance, even when taking into account the health status of both groups, due to the large differences in the results. It is widely believed that vaccination prevents severe disease, but there was no evidence of this when COVID-19 was still deadly.
As a possible explanation for the increased risk of death in vaccine recipients, the study authors observed a surge in IgG4 antibodies in the vaccinated population. Several studies have found that vaccines cause an unusual surge in these permissive antibodies, rather than neutralizing antibodies, which may be responsible for a Trojan horse effect that allows the virus to penetrate deep into the body behind the immune system’s defenses.
Meanwhile, new Preprint Researchers from Oxford University looked at one million children to compare the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccinated and unvaccinated children who recovered from COVID. They found no cases in the unvaccinated, even though the spike protein of the virus itself can harm cardiovascular health. This means that if we look at all the data showing an excess of heart attacks since 2021, it’s likely that most of them are due to the vaccine and not the virus.
How many more studies, data points, and government documents need to be revealed before opposition to these mRNA vaccines becomes trendy among Republicans?
What’s shocking is that the South Carolina General Assembly, at the behest of Republican Governor Henry McMaster, is convening a special session to consider a health minister bill to consolidate the state’s health bureaucracy, without addressing any of the obnoxious policies at the head of these agencies. To this day, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control is still recommending COVID vaccinations for infants. Where is the urgency to convene a special session to remove these vaccines from the market in a Republican-leaning state?
In that sense, who can blame Moderna and the FDA for moving forward with the next mRNA poison injection when the so-called opposition refuses to acknowledge the human tragedy of their first experiment?
