WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and other globalists have been staunchly opposed to the idea in recent months. Pandemic AgreementThose who have dared to suggest that a legally binding agreement would undermine American sovereignty and impose additional financial burdens on American taxpayers, as well as those who have argued that the WHO cannot be trusted, corruption–Proneand The Chinese Communist Party’s Compromise Organization.
In an attempt to turn things around by stoking fears about “Disease X,” Ghebreyesus called for a successful vote on a global health compact at the 77th World Health Assembly, held in Geneva, Switzerland, from May 27 to June 1. His hopes were dashed when the Assembly failed to agree on the text or passage of the compact.
However, The Blaze News previously reported that the WHA had succeeded in adopting amendments to the International Health Regulations aimed at strengthening “global preparedness, surveillance and response to public health emergencies, including pandemics”.
Critics have expressed concerns.
amendmentThe bill, which was adopted by “consensus” rather than an actual vote, may not be as advertised and may not even be legal under the WHO’s own rules.
American biochemist Dr. Robert Malone
Claimed On Monday, “The IHR was hastily approved. [amendments] “It strengthens the Director-General’s virtually unlimited authority and power to declare public health emergencies and pandemics, as defined by him or her, to prompt and guide the allocation of global resources and broad public health actions and guidelines.”
“The WHO’s failures during the COVID-19 pandemic have been as complete as they were predictable and have caused lasting damage to our country.”
The IHR are legally binding international instruments approved under Article 21 of the WHO Constitution, and all 194 WHO member states, including the U.S. Amendments submitted to the WHA are advanced by consensus, but decisions are made by voting.are legally available options”
WHO Member States
Agreed It will consider potential reform of the IHR in January 2022. The decision was driven in part by concerns about the adverse effects of discrimination, misinformation and stigma on prevention, preparedness and response to public health emergencies, as well as unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade, and by recognition of the need for enhanced coordination.
The amendment was negotiated in parallel with the so far unsuccessful Pandemic Agreement but was drawn up in the same spirit.
according to According to the Liberty Council, the proposed amendments would “take a major step to adapt and integrate national pandemic responses in response to COVID-19, directing countries to develop ‘core’ capabilities in areas such as surveillance (vaccine passports/digital health certificates), risk communication (censorship of misinformation and disinformation), implementation of control measures (social distancing/lockdowns), and access to health services and products (greater sharing of resources and technology between countries).”
Kaiser Family Foundation
report The Biden administration remained actively engaged in the negotiations, despite urging from Republicans including Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) to reject the amendment, saying it would “significantly strengthen WHO’s health emergency powers and constitute an unacceptable infringement of U.S. sovereignty.”
Cassidy, Johnson and the entire Senate Republican Conference support President Joe Biden
Letter of May 1st“WHO’s failures during the COVID-19 pandemic have been as complete as they were predictable, and have caused lasting damage to our nation. The United States cannot ignore the WHO’s recent inability to perform its most basic functions, and must insist on comprehensive WHO reform before considering any revisions to the International Health Regulations.”
“We consider such an agreement to be a treaty requiring the consent of two-thirds of the Senate under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution.”
Dr. Malone and
The Heritage FoundationRepublicans argued that adopting new IHR amendments at the 77th World Health Assembly would violate WHO regulations. International Health RegulationsSpecifically, Article 55 provides that “any proposed amendment shall be communicated by the Director-General to all States Parties at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is to be proposed for consideration.”
“We argue that because the WHO has not yet presented its final amendments to member states, the IHR amendments may not be considered at next month’s WHA,” the Republicans wrote. “Should this advice be ignored, we state in the strongest possible terms that we would consider any such agreement a treaty requiring a two-thirds Senate vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution.”
The Biden administration negotiated the amendment not only in the face of possible pushback from Congress, but also with the foresight that the United States may not be bound by it depending on the outcome of the 2024 election. After all, President Donald Trump
Be expected To once again Movement to withdraw the US from WHO.
“The final version of the IHR will significantly strengthen the authority of the WHO.”
WHO
Said In a statement on Saturday, the WHA and its 194 member states said: [on] “We have finalized important reforms to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) and made a concrete commitment to complete negotiations on a global pandemic agreement no later than one year.”
“The revised International Health Regulations will strengthen countries’ capacity and coordination with other countries on disease surveillance, information sharing and response, strengthening our ability to detect and respond to future epidemics and pandemics,” Ghebreyesus said. “It is based on a commitment to equity, a recognition that health threats know no borders, and that preparedness is a shared effort.”
Despite hinting at agreement among member states, the Sovereign Union
was suggested With around 30 percent of member states present, Ghebreyesus refused to hold a roll call vote.
The amendments ultimately adopted by the 77th World Health Assembly included a new definition of a “pandemic emergency,” a different “fairness”-based international wealth redistribution mechanism, the creation of a new bureaucratic body to oversee implementation of the other half of the measures, and the creation of an IHR Authority to help member states “improve coordination of the implementation of the rules within and among countries.”
Liberty Counsel acknowledged that the language in the amendments was weakened during negotiations, but noted that “the final IHR significantly strengthens the WHO’s authority.”
U.S. Department of State
Claimed The amendment will “strengthen the overall global health security architecture while fully respecting the sovereignty of each state.”
The Kaiser Family Foundation said, “If approved by the WHA, [IHR] This amendment does not require further approval or ratification by the United States Congress.”
British Government
Shown Each member state has the right to “evaluate each proposed amendment before making a sovereign choice as to whether to accept or reject each or all of the proposed amendments.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get stories like this directly to your inbox. Register here!
