The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of a grandmother who was jailed for alleged retaliation, according to Fox News.
The Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling in favor of former City Council Member Sylvia Gonzalez of Castle Hills, Texas, upholding her First Amendment rights. The case revolved around allegations that local authorities, including Castle Hills Mayor JR Trevino, orchestrated her arrest in retaliation for her critical comments about the mayor, and thus engaged in political retaliation. according to To Fox News.
Texas grandmother jailed for alleged political retaliation at Supreme Court https://t.co/8CGNWRW99g
— Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) June 20, 2024
Gonzalez, 72 at the time of the incident, was charged with trying to block a non-binding petition from the city council, but the charges were later dropped, the outlet reported. He was actively involved in a movement to replace Mayor Ryan LaPerry when he was arrested. (Related: Supreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor dispute)
The controversy began at Mayor Gonzalez’s first City Council meeting in 2019, when during a discussion about the mayor’s performance, she inadvertently placed the petition in her binder. The situation escalated when Mayor Trevino and Police Chief John Siemens reportedly opened a criminal investigation based on the misplaced petition, ultimately leading to Mayor Gonzalez’s arrest.
“I didn’t even know what I was being accused of,” Gonzalez told Fox News. “I’d never been in prison before. It was very scary for an old woman like me.”
WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 20: The exterior of the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on June 20, 2024. In an election year, the Supreme Court will be at the center of many hot political topics as it prepares to rule on a variety of high-profile cases, including abortion rights, gun rights, and former President Donald Trump’s immunity claim. (Photo by Andrew Harnick/Getty Images)
The Supreme Court criticized the Fifth Circuit for requiring Gonzalez to present evidence of others who were similarly situated but were not arrested.
“The Court believes that Ms. Gonzalez must provide very specific comparative evidence – identifiable examples of individuals who, like Ms. Gonzalez, ‘mishandled government petitions’ but were not arrested,” the Supreme Court wrote in an unsigned opinion, Fox News reported. “Requiring a substantially identical, identifiable comparator is too much.”
