American politics is complicated in a lot of ways, like explaining the Electoral College to foreigners or remembering the last time a political party held a moderated convention, but one thing is easy to understand: you can’t claim to be a family-friendly political party if you believe that killing fetuses in the womb is a human right and that mutilating confused teenagers is “gender-affirming care.”
It is important to point out this obvious point because the media has already begun to portray both presidential candidates Harris and Waltz as “pro-family” despite their espouse of an anti-human worldview. Make no mistake, every aspect of the left’s social policies is hostile to the creation and thriving of families.
Destroying children’s bodies and corrupting their minds does not seem “pro-family” to me.
They redefined marriage from a lifelong union between a man and a woman to a covenant relationship between adults. profile The coverage of polyamorous entanglements in a magazine like New York heralds the next battleground that will redefine the institution.
The left’s embrace of second-wave feminism has taught at least three generations of women to see children as a burden, home as a prison, and marriage as bondage. Gloria Steinem’s students may not have said, “Women need men like fish need bicycles,” but her toxic views have sowed the seeds of discord between the sexes.
The Democrats are also the party of the welfare state, which has turned government into a patriarchy for millions of families headed by single mothers. One consequence of a culture that believes in Uncle Sam is can The importance of being a husband and father to low-income women and their children is something that governments, whether federal or local, must take seriously. Should Responsible for all family members.
One of the stories the media is using to convince voters that the Harris administration is good for families is universal schools. lunch The bill will be signed into law by Tim Walz in 2023. Surrounded A crowd of smiling Minnesota elementary school kids gathered. On the surface, it’s a great story about an elected official promising to feed the state’s children, but good policy is about more than a nice photo op.
Conservatives are opposed to free school meals because of their belief that middle-class and wealthy families don’t need them. They believe it’s an inefficient use of public funds to pay for school meals when their parents have no problem feeding them. Progressives are opposed. My personal opinion is that: Interactions When discussing this issue, the average progressive on social media seems to think that American children are born into the wild and left uncared for until an elected Democrat comes along and provides them with food, clothing and shelter. no What would children eat if the government didn’t provide school lunches? every This is a natural consequence of an ever-expanding welfare state that persuades parents to hand over primary responsibility to politicians and bureaucrats.
But I have bigger problems with the left than feeding kids frozen pizza and tater tots. A party that claims to care for the poor and working class would support universal school lunches rather than universal school choice. Some progressives pay lip service to the success of charter schools run by big-city districts, but all They dislike vouchers and other programs that allow parents to use taxpayer money to send their children to private or religious schools, and while they support working-class children using Pell Grants to attend private colleges, they resist the idea of using public funds to give the most disadvantaged children the opportunity to avoid low-performing schools.
This is exactly what the Democrat brand is all about: handing out free cookies and chocolate milk and pretending to fight for families while teachers unions oppose school choice for poor kids because they fear competition. Those on Martha’s Vineyard would never send their kids to a school where the students can’t read, write, or do math, but they have no problem sending low-income kids to such schools.
This is a feature of progressive thought, not a flaw. The left is always willing to let children suffer for the sake of adults. The message the left gives to women is never “be prepared to sacrifice your career for your children”; it’s always “be prepared to sacrifice your children for your career.”
A political party that disregards fetuses confusion He taught biology from kindergarten onwards, gave them puberty suppressants in the fifth grade, push A middle school mastectomy; Slice Exposing genitals in high school. All of this is done with the approval of adults who pride themselves on being open and affirming. I’m no political commentator or pollster, but I’m not convinced that destroying children’s bodies and corrupting their minds is “pro-family.”
