SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Mango’s AI models slammed as ‘false advertising’ amid fears of lost jobs

They are modeling a scary concept.

Major fashion brands that use digitally created models in clothing ads have recently begun facing backlash over the industry-changing practice. Just as we launched another AI campaign targeting teenagers.

For Mango, which already has its highest revenue in 40 years, the addition of AI models last summer “will help us create content faster,” said CEO Toni Ruiz. told Bloomberg last month.

But customers don't buy it.

Clothing company Mango has come under fire for using AI-built models. mango
@marcos.angelides

We need to discuss how to define false advertising. It would be a problem if a mascara brand used false eyelashes in an ad, but if a pizza brand used glue to look like melted cheese, it's just a prop design. The rules seem a bit contradictory. The rise of Gen AI will force the industry to rethink these definitions. Mango just released an entire campaign using Gen AI, but what do you think? Is the use of this technology just a creative technique, like applying Photoshop, or is the use of a model and Is it false advertising because the clothes they're wearing aren't actually real? So far, no one is sure. #mango eye #ai advertising #False Advertisement #iNews #Marketing News

♬ Original song – Marcos Angelides

TikTokker Marcos Angelides, who produces a video series on AI in advertising, started a discussion about Mango's practices. The clip is tagged with the hashtag #falseadvertising.

He stepped into the gray area of ​​the practice and addressed feedback from several commenters about their concerning thoughts.

“So if a mascara brand used false eyelashes in an ad, it would be an issue, but if a pizza brand used glue to make the cheese look gooey, it would just be seen as a pop design,” he said. He spoke on TV camera. “Inconsistent” ruleset.

This video by TikTokker Marcos Angelides sparked a heated debate as it showed in detail what Mango's AI model looks like. Users lamented that the practice was unethical and did not provide customers with realistic standards for how their clothes should fit. TikTok / @marcos.angelides

Angelides said generative AI used to create non-human models and advertisements is bound to “redefine” how the industry properly leverages this technology.

“Is text just a creative tool, like applying Photoshop, or just a lens for advertising?” he asked.

“Or is it false advertising because the models and the clothes they wear don't actually exist? For now, no one knows.”

Some expressed frustration that this could cause people to lose their jobs.

“Another creative job fired,” a user sneered.

Beyond ethics, shoppers shared their biggest quality concerns with the AI ​​model in the video comments.

Ethics aside, many are concerned that AI models won't be able to adequately indicate how well a garment will fit. PixelBiss – Stock.adobe.com

“When I order clothes online, I look at pictures to see how the clothes will fit in real life. AI pictures are totally useless for that,” one person said, adding that One said the idea was “very wrong”.

“So I think there could be a lot of complaints because what arrives could be something completely different and could be something completely different,” another wrote. Masu.

Angelides responded to that comment, noting that consumer protection laws are in place, and said, “This includes shoppers who expect advertising to reflect their products.”

People are debating whether Mango's AI model is ethical or a new type of misleading advertising. mango

Legal or not, multiple TikTok users suggested ways for customers to take back some control and force companies to adhere to consumer standards.

“Please don't buy from Mango” [until] They're stopping this,” one person commented, while another called for a “boycott.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News