SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Stanford University professor Jeff Hancock accused of using AI to cite fake study

Subscribe to Fox News to access this content

The maximum number of articles has been reached. To read more, log in for free or create an account.

Enter your email address[続行]By pressing , you agree to Fox News' Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, including notice of financial incentives.

Please enter a valid email address.

A Stanford University “misinformation expert” has been accused of using artificial intelligence (AI) to create testimony that was later used by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in a politically charged case.

Jeff Hancock, a communications professor and founder of the school's Social Media Lab, provided expert testimony in a lawsuit involving a satirical conservative YouTuber named Christopher Coles. The lawsuit concerns Minnesota's recent ban on political deepfakes, which the plaintiffs claim is an attack on free speech.

Hancock's testimony was submitted to the court by Ellison, who argued in favor of the law. According to Stanford University's website, Hancock is “best known for his research into how people use technology to exploit deception, from sending texts and emails to detecting fake online reviews.” It is said that

But lawyers for the plaintiffs asked the federal judge in Minnesota hearing the case to dismiss Hancock's testimony, saying he cited false research.

What is artificial intelligence (AI)?

A Stanford University professor has been accused of using an AI language model to write an expert declaration. (Getty Images)

”[The] “Professor Jeff Hancock's declaration cites research that does not exist. No paper with that title exists,” the lawyers argued in a recent 36-page memo.

The “study” is called “The Effects of Deepfake Videos on Political Attitudes and Behaviors,” and it reportedly includes: Journal of Information Technology and Politics. of Filed on November 16th It points out that while the journal is real, it has never published research under that name.

“The publication exists, but the cited pages belong to unrelated articles,” the lawyers argued. “Perhaps this research was an 'illusion' generated by an AI large-scale language model like ChatGPT.”

“Plaintiffs do not know how this hallucination was reflected in Hancock's statement, but they question the document as a whole, especially when much of the commentary contains no methodology or analytical logic.'' I will throw it.”

The document also criticizes Ellison, claiming that “Ellison's most trusted conclusions have no methodology behind them and consist solely of expert opinion.”

“Hancock could have cited actual research similar to the proposition in paragraph 21,” the memo said. “However, by the existence of the fictitious quotation, Hancock (or his assistants) did not even attempt to cast doubt on the quality and veracity of the entire declaration.”

Biden's Executive Order on 'Awakened' Artificial Intelligence, Dubbed a 'Social Cancer'

artificial intelligence language model

Microsoft Bing Chat and ChatGPT AI chat applications are seen on a mobile device in this photo illustration from Warsaw, Poland, July 21, 2023. (Jaap Arrians/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The memo also further strengthens the argument that the citations are false, noting that the attorneys conducted multiple searches to find the study.

“Neither the title nor even any part of the alleged article appears anywhere on the Internet indexed by the most commonly used search engines, Google or Bing,” the document states. is stated. “A search on Google Scholar, a specialized search engine for academic papers and patent publications, found no papers matching the description of the citation written by ‘fans.’ [the purported author] It includes the term “deepfake.”

“Maybe this was just a copy-and-paste error? Not so,” the filing later flatly states. “That article doesn't exist.”

The lawyers concluded that if the declaration was partially fabricated, it was completely unreliable and should be excluded from consideration by the court.

“Professor Hancock's declaration should be completely excluded because it is based, at least in part, on fabricated material believed to have been generated by an AI model, casting doubt on its conclusive claims,” ​​the document said. concludes. “The court will investigate the source of the fabrication and further measures may be warranted.”

Keith Ellison at the DNC

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison arrives on stage to speak during the third day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center on August 21, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. (Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital has reached out to Ellison University, Hancock University and Stanford University for comment.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News