Former California Governor Jerry Brown (Democratic) distance yourself from yourself From the state's extreme sanctuary policy, even though he was the one who initiated the policy in the first place.
in an interview on thursday KXTVBrown argued that the policy prohibiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials goes too far.
“Subsequent laws…applied more broadly.”
Brown was previously supported California Assembly Bill 4preventing local law enforcement from responding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention requests.
ICE detainees have asked law enforcement to hold illegal aliens already in custody for up to 48 hours from their release date so that federal agents can transfer them to federal custody. Ignoring the demands of these detainers releases criminal illegal immigrants into society, forcing ICE to expend extra resources to locate and arrest these people. This is more costly for taxpayers and more dangerous for immigration officials.
Brown also supported it in 2017 during the first Trump administration. California Senate Bill 54prohibited the transfer of illegal aliens to ICE and prohibited federal agencies from notifying prisoners of their release dates.
Brown's position on sanctuary laws resurfaced in California this week after the San Diego County Board of Supervisors decided to approve a policy that expands protections for undocumented immigrants, including those with criminal records.
Chair Nora Vargas argued in her proposal that the new conservation policy is consistent with state law enacted by Brown.
A recently passed policy “guarantees that release will not be delayed absent a federal warrant.” It also prohibits ICE from using county detention facilities “for investigative interviews or other purposes.”
KXTV told Brown that critics of California's sanctuary law argue that the state should lose federal funding for allegedly violating federal immigration law.
“The bill I signed is [SB 54] There were some exceptions. Some people convicted of violent or serious crimes did not receive the benefits of so-called sanctuary. ”
“It's a matter of having state officials handle issues at the state level, rather than trying to play like Texas, that they are federal officials,” Brown said.
“I think subsequent legislation has broadened it even further,” he said. “Some cities, like San Francisco, have gone far beyond wall efforts, approaching a separation of state and federal governments. I'm doing it,'' he claimed.
“I think it's going to be difficult,” Brown said.
He further argued that Democrats are now advocating for stronger borders and a legal process for allowing foreigners into the country.
“The fact is, we rely heavily on immigration, but we need a process, and Republicans have blocked it,” Brown said.
He said he hopes the incoming Trump administration can implement a more orderly and lawful process, noting that the number of foreign nationals allowed into the United States should be “significantly limited.”
Brown rejected the theory that California is violating federal immigration law.
He added: “There's some cooperation, but we're not turning people over to the federal government. The federal government can certainly show up wherever they want to show up.”
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
