Over the past year, many major American companies have rejected DEI and correspondingly dismantled racist policies, LGBT activism, and other alienating left-wing initiatives. On the other hand, Walmart, Ford, Harley-Davidson, Tractor Supply, Jack Daniel's, john deereseem to have learned from conservative consumers' success in converting Bud Light into an undesirable verb, but perhaps Costco's management, which employs more than 300,000 people, is immune to that lesson. Looks like he's willing to at least try his luck.
The company's board of directors recently directed shareholders to take similar steps to reevaluate the company's relationship with DEI.
The National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank,
proposed Shareholders are calling for a vote on January 23 to require Costco's board to conduct an assessment and publish a report on the risks of maintaining Costco's current DEI role, policies, and goals.
In its proposal, the NCPPR took note of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 29, 2023 decision. decision in Student for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard/UNCbanning race-based college admissions could invalidate previous legal advice regarding the legality of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
“The cost to Costco could be in the tens of billions of dollars.”
The high court ruled that allowing universities to consider race in their admissions procedures is unconstitutional under the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause and violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. in spite of,
quarrel Although some legal experts say the decision does not directly impact private employers, it nonetheless paves the way for lawsuits and federal civil rights. complaint Targeted for corporate DEI initiatives.
Shannon Phillips' comments come after a number of DEI-related lawsuits have been filed, with one company winning “more than $25 million in damages in one case of discrimination against white employees.” Quoted. Lawsuit against Starbucks — The think tank emphasizes that continued acceptance of DEI “poses litigation, reputational, and financial risks to the company and, therefore, to its shareholders.” did.
NCPPR further notes that despite apparent rebranding efforts, Costco
DEI’s discriminatory legacy living in it “People and Community” Program.
“The renamed program still openly proclaims its ‘commitment to equity’ (meaning equality of outcomes rather than opportunity), still employs a ‘chief diversity officer’ and The company still has a supplier diversity program that selects suppliers based on race and gender, and while the company appears to take race and gender into account in hiring and promotions, it still has shareholders in organizations that promote discriminatory DEI policies. ,” the proposal reads.
“Costco, which has 310,000 employees, may have at least 200,000 employees who could be victims of this type of unlawful discrimination because they are white, Asian, male, or straight. “is high,'' the proposal continued. “Even if only a small percentage of its employees sued, and only a small percentage of them won, the cost to Costco could be in the tens of billions of dollars.”
The think tank's proposal clearly irritated the board. Not only did the board unanimously recommend a vote against the investigation exposing the company's continued embrace of a “discriminatory agenda,” it also doubled down on its DEI rhetoric.
“Our board of directors has considered this proposal and believes that our commitment to being a company rooted in respect and inclusion is appropriate,” the board wrote. “We believe our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion is legally sound, and there is nothing in the proposal to indicate otherwise.”
Board of Directors — chaired by billionaire Democratic donor Hamilton James
poured millions of dollars into Participation in the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Joe Biden — suggested that identity-centered DEI practices can help attract and retain employees. The result is a “diverse group of employees” [that] It helps us bring originality and creativity to our product offering. ” and fulfills the customer’s supposed desire to “see themselves reflected in the people in the warehouse.”
Stephen Padfield, director of NCPPR's Free Enterprise Project, accused Costco of “doubling down on a new racist DEI program.”
states“Costco did not deny any of the evidence of racial discrimination at Costco that we cited in our proposal.”
“Costco clearly justifies its discrimination because, among other things, 'a diverse group of employees helps us bring originality and creativity to our product offerings,'” Padfield wrote. “It's not unreasonable to conclude that this sounds like pure racial essentialism. If originality and creativity are the goal, why not hire the most creative and original people possible?”
“Not only is it unethical, it is illegal and risks future litigation.”
Costco accuses NCPPR of “burdening companies by challenging long-standing diversity programs.'' But with the recent wave of customer backlash against DEI, it has become clear that DEI is the problem,” Padfield continued. “Instead of doing the right thing and assessing the associated risks as required, Costco appears to be doubling down on DEI that is clearly divisive and value-destroying.”
“DEI is the redistribution of opportunity to employees, potential employees, and suppliers based on race and gender,” Ethan Peck, deputy director of the Free Enterprise Project, said in a statement.
obtained By Fox News Digital. “This is not only unethical, it is illegal and risks future litigation. It also comes at the expense of merit and, ultimately, excellence and innovation, but the company is willing to do so.” “We have a fiduciary duty to our shareholders to maximize at the altar” of arbitrarily determined diversity. ”
Fox has not received a comment from Costco.
Costco's board of directors recommended that DEI be adhered to because the Network Infection Research Institute and Rutgers University found that the push for absolute fairness could undermine pluralism and breed (potentially violent) greed. This was just a few weeks after the release of damning research results that revealed that Ideological purity. ”
The study found that “although they purport to combat bias, some anti-oppressive DEI discourses can lead to hostile attributional biases and lead to racial suspicions, prejudicial attitudes, and authoritarian policing.” , may increase support for punitive action in the absence of evidence of a punishable violation.'' ”
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
