Carbon forms the basis of plant life and comes from almost every energy source that keeps us warm, with the exception of nuclear power. With extended cold weather forecast for much of the country, it's time to end the war over carbon, lives and efficient energy production. Wyoming conservatives are proposing an SF 92 solution.Making carbon great again” invoice.
For years, most Republican governors have tolerated or tolerated the push for “carbon-neutral” energy. This is also referred to as a transition from reliable energy sources to less effective options that harm the land and environment. They primarily differ from Democrats on how quickly to pursue this nuclear winter of potential energy. In Wyoming, the governor said,carbon negative” conservative groups are on the offensive, rejecting the idea that carbon is a problem rather than a primary driver of the economy.
Most Americans are staying warm this winter thanks to carbon-based fuels. Stop demonizing them.
Introduced by State Senator Cheri Steinmetz and former Wyoming Freedom Caucus Chairman John Baer law It would prohibit states from restricting carbon-based energy sources or treating carbon like a pollutant. Among other things, the measure would overturn a five-year-old Liberal law that required coal-fired power plants to use “carbon capture” technology.
Wyoming is supposed to lead the nation in coal production, but the coal industry has been crushed by the carbon hoax. Instead of fighting misinformation, the state government only promoted it. Under the new bill, Wyoming would reimburse consumers for fees paid under the mandatory carbon capture retrofit program.
Most importantly, this bill debunks the belief that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, that it causes the climate to warm, and that human activities contribute significantly to such warming. It begins with several pages of research findings. The law calls carbon a “basic nutrient necessary for all life on Earth,” a position that all Republican-led Congresses must take.
the biggest lie of our time
Human activity is only about 4% of carbon in the atmospherethe exact rate of carbon dioxide increase caused by humans remains controversial. A recent paper published in the journal Health Physics by researchers at the University of Massachusetts Lowell used carbon-14 data to determine how much of the carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere since 1750 has been added by humans. It is concluded that only 12% of “Too low to be a cause of global warming,” they wrote.
Therefore, there is no clear correlation, let alone proof of causation, between energy use and higher carbon levels, or higher carbon levels and rising temperatures. For example, in 2022, renewable energy increased by 12% and coal use decreased by 8%, but U.S. carbon emissions Still, it rose 1.3%.. Climate change conspiracy theorists got what they wanted, even though human input is clearly too small to influence a process that unfolds over thousands of years.
And there is certainly no evidence that carbon is systematically causing irreversible warming across the planet. Dr Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, said that carbon dioxide typically lags temperature rise by about 800 years, which suggests that temperature rise will occur first, followed by a rise in carbon dioxide. He said he thought so. “No situation has proven that CO2 is the cause and temperature is the effect. None.” he said. “There's no situation where we can really say we know that from empirical evidence or science.”
Moore observes that the Warm Era began long before modern industrialization. For example, the US Dust Bowl of the 1930s set numerous high temperature records. a study The researchers found that 10,000 to 12,000 years ago Italy was 3 to 4 degrees Celsius warmer, even though carbon dioxide levels at the time were 20% lower than pre-industrial levels of 280 ppm. discovered.
Moore said the current warming trend has been going on for about 300 years. Started 150 years ago Fossil fuels have become widely used. He argues that despite the exponential increase in carbon emissions, the rate of warming has not changed, concluding that “the thermometer hasn't moved an inch.”
“That's all people need to know to realize they're being scammed.”
CO2 doesn't matter
some scientists claim The warming trend is more consistent with absorbed solar radiation than with carbon dioxide concentrations, which explains why the observed warming has not been uniform, the researchers say. A new study by several geoscience departments in southern states shows that the southeastern United States has continued to cool over the past 120 years, despite emissions and urban heat island effects.
Other studies suggest Cloud cover and other complex weather factors cause different warming cycles at different times and locations. One study identifies the jet stream as a “dynamic driver of climate change” dating back to 1300.
Some researchers attribute the warming trend to: Rise in sea surface temperature It argues that emissions are “irrelevant” when compared to cyclical changes in the ocean, not emissions. They add that human activities cannot meaningfully heat the oceans, stating: the study Describing the atmosphere, whatever it contains, only affects the top 0.01 millimeters of ocean surface.
Finally, critics say it's naive to think you can measure every inch of Earth's temperature over the past 150 years and predict the next century to within 1 degree Fahrenheit. Another recent study, confirmed by NASA satellite data, suggests that from 1880 to 2020, aging weather stations inflated estimates of global warming by 42%.
This lie is too dangerous to ignore, and Republicans must stop parroting it. We must stop destroying our lives and the environment because of carbon hoaxes.
All states should pass legislation like Wyoming's SF 92 that eliminates any mention of anti-carbon policies, let alone mandates. At the federal level, Congress must eliminate all anti-carbon mandates and subsidies, including carbon capture grifts.
What better time to champion common sense than in a month when much of the country is bracing for sub-zero temperatures? Despite hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies, a monopoly on public debate, and anti-carbon mandates, solar and wind still only provide about 10% of electricity. And most of that comes from regions that don't face extreme cold. Most Americans are staying warm this winter thanks to carbon-based fuels. Stop demonizing them.
