Senator Elissa Slotkin (Democratic Party, Michigan) stated that using the U.S. military as a law execution agency on Sunday on Sunday on the ABC border is a violation of the constitution.
Partial transfer is as follows:
Radaz: Let's talk about the army. 1,500 people are already planned or already deployed. Probably there will be even more in the future. This time, those troops will be armed. First, your reaction to the collapse (pH) of these troops, the inflow of the army into the border, and the idea that they are armed.
Slot Kin: Yes, that is, I think you've been dispatching several uniforms and active troops on the southern border so far. According to our constitution, we can do anything, such as assistive roles, logistics, driving, facilities, and border settings. The situation is very different when you enter the law execution agency beyond the line.
Our troops are not trained as a lawyer. They will tell you first. That's not why they started services. And it violates the constitution. Therefore, I think it is very important to keep the line.
We knew that the administration was going to use military aircraft to return people. They were -the -they were going to broadcast it on TV. We knew it. But you are right near logistics, support, and law execution agencies. As they say, if there are criminals on those airplanes, who will execute the order of those airplanes? You just approach it. Therefore, this was what I raised to him at Hesces's approval hearing. What I want to know is that you don't swear to Donald Trump, but you don't intend to use the uniform army in a way that violates the constitution and scares American people. is. That is, when the British occupied us, we were afraid of the British. We don't want to repeat it. So I observe it very carefully.
Follow the pam key with x @pamkeyynen
