Noel Clark was hit by a legal measure against the Guardian after a high court judge refused to try to attack the publisher in the incident.
In the center of London, on Wednesday, actors and producers tried to prevent the Guardian, which depends on the defense of the truth and public interests in a trial for honor ATION and data protection, but Judge Stain, “Absolutely despair. After hearing that it was “, I refused to apply.
Gavin Miller KC, who appeared in the Guardian, told the court to use the hearing on Wednesday to make “unfounded and unfounded petitions of wild nature.”
Clark, who is the best -known in his childhood film trilogy, has appealed to the Guardian rather than an article published in 2021 and 2022 after a survey set up multiple claims of fraud. Masu.
Clark's legal team called for the Guardian Journalist to remove the defense, alleged that it had created evidence.
However, Philip Williams, a court lawyer acting for Clark, noted that the Guardian could not point out documents.
Miller told the court as follows. If it is performed outside the court, it will be justified. “
He sees Clark's privilege in court's lawsuit, and when he is told outside the court, he is complaining of the honor Lib. He said he was.
In another set of Clark, the judge also refused to apply by the Guardian's investigator Paul Lewis before the trial, which is scheduled to start in March.
Miller says that the claimant is asking for a “fragment of mud that can be thrown at Lewis and the Guardian”, and Clark says, “Using his advice with inappropriate and boring … a petition … I can't say it outside of the court, who can pick up them and report them clearly.
The first article about Clark reported a claim from 20 women who claimed sexual misconduct.
On Wednesday, after Williams suggested that a part of the petitioner “does not exist”, Miller “Wildlife Claims” and “He uses this court to have no basis for the wild nature. I will file a claim. “
Clark's another court lawyer, Daniel Jeremy, has revealed that no legal team has claimed that none of the petitioners existed.
Clark has denied sexual and wrongdoing. He once accepted that he once made an inappropriate comment on one woman. He stated in November 2023: “I have always opposed the content of eight Guardian articles.”
Guardian Spokesman states: The Guardian lawyer has no evidence that a journalist has made an evidence of “counterfeiting” evidence that a very serious claim made in court has filed a petrol domain that could not be done outside the court. I told the court.
The judge said he would tell him why he would refuse to apply at a later date.
