Ratified by Silil Ramafosa, South Africa's socialist president
law On January 25, the government could seize land without compensation. The dominant coalition because white farmers still own many lands Apparently We know a new law of redistributing property to members of racial groups with priority in the nation.
President Donald Trump, quoted by the 2024 expenditure law
It is attracting attention “Until the complete survey of this situation is completed, he will block all the funds to South Africa in the future.”
Last year, the United States According to where it is conveyed Commit to more than $ 323 million foreign support to South Africa. A US International Development Organization, which appears to be in a shutter posture, has instructed most of the funds. In 2023, the United States poured more than $ 439 million to funding African countries.
“South Africa has confiscated land and handles people in a specific class very terribly,” Trump writes. “It's a bad situation not to mention the radical left media. At least, a large -scale human rights violation that everyone can see. The United States does not support it. Activities.”
Under the controversial law, it will be abolished
1975 expenditure methodThe nation can capture land under the name of “public interest” defined as “a national commitment to land reform”, and to provide fair access to all natural resources in South Africa. Reforms can be performed. Under the name of the past racist or comparison, or the name of “public purpose,” this is a flexible term that effectively means that the purpose of the state suggests is “for the interests of the people.”
The state can compensate the owner of the expanded property based on the law, but if it is judged that it is “fair and fair”, it is permission to pay “NIL”. It is done. When landowners steal property, the state must show that they have tried without succeeding to reach the agreement to acquire property under conditions that are considered “rational.”
“Why do you have an open racist ownership law?”
After being informed that the property is stolen until the land owner loses its own property, “it is necessary to take all reasonable measures to maintain the property.” Otherwise, landowners may be set to lose their property.
Recently, Zsa-Zsa BoggenPoel, a professor at Stellen Bosh University in South Africa
Hinted The law states that it will be a tool that will take place in a racist way.
In the past of South Africa colonies and apartheit, land distribution was terribly unfair based on race. The country is still suffering from this effect. Therefore, property expisit is a potential tool to reduce land inequality. This was a matter of an increase in urgency. South Africans have been impatient at the slow pace of land reform.
South African Marxist Leninist Party, Economic Freedom Warriors commonly advocate their leaders and members to kill white farmers, and the law redistries land from white farmers to black citizens. Although it suggested that it was not enough, other political parties were unconstitutional, which described the previous draft, It has been reported Bloomberg.
Ramafosa It is attracting attention “The recently adopted exposement method is not a confiscation method, but a legal procedure that is obliged in the constitution to guarantee public access to land in a fair and fair way based on the Constitution.” A statement in.
In response to Trump's threat, socialists added as follows. “The United States is an important strategic political and trade partner in South Africa. There are no other funds received, except for the 17 % of the Hivaids programs in South Africa, which accounts for 17 % of the Hivaids programs in South Africa.
Eron Mask, born and raised in South Africa, later
I asked Rama Fosa, “Why are you openly and the ownership of racist?”
The Flea Market Foundation, a Johannesburg -based Rivatarian think tank, is one of the legal groups of laws. Martin Van Standen, the policy officer of the think tank,
It is attracting attention On Monday, “South Africans do the patriotism is to oppose the government's attempts to implement expenditures without compensation so that foreign actors point out.”
“Hiding that there is no compensation for” NIL “compensation does not cure its confiscation or unconstitutional exposement method,” said Van Studen.
Like Blaze News? Bypass censorship, sign up to the newsletter, and get such a story directly to the receiving tray. Please sign up here!
