ESPN women's sports analysts ban Trump's executive order as “disgusting” trans athletes and asked the female athlete fathers about the threat of posting their daughter's ability to play on “trans girls.”
In her first post, ESPN employee Arielle Chambers, who describes herself as a speaker on “women's sports,” took the president on both executive order and on its timing duties.
“I hate executive orders that prohibit trans girls and women from participating in sports,” Chambers wrote. “It's pointed out that it's to do that to the girls and women of the nation on sports day. Evil.”
After the above post, Chambers responded to another user, describing himself as the father of three daughters to immediately start playing sports, agreeing to the president's executive order.
Chambers asked: What about the dad who is a trans girl who can't see their kids playing sports? What do you think will happen to your daughter if TransGarl is a teammate or opponent? ”
It is always possible that Chambers understand that men are physically bigger, faster and stronger than women, and that they are unaware of the threat of trans athletes posing on women. He only says he's currying favors to left-wing employers.
After all, we all saw the most mediocre male swimmers in history become the greatest swimmers in the history of the NCAA girls category a few years ago. So she You shouldn't Confusing about what threats men pose to female athletes.
Whether it was Chambers' integrity or not, she was immediately chuckling for what she wrote.
Chambers may not understand why fathers are happy about why their daughters don't have to compete with guys for a spot on the roster, but the good news is that most Americans do. CNN's Harry Enten showed that 79% of Americans agree that trans athletes should not be allowed to compete in women's sports.
Thankfully, the majority of Americans are not “really” confused as to why men should not compete with women.
