This weekend, Kamala Harris joined Broadway.
And she reminded America that we really avoided bullets by not choosing her.
She and her husband Doug Emov met with the cast of “The Wonderful World: Louis Armstrong Musical,” and she became famous by Damon Wayans' “Living Colors” character Oswald Bates. I gave a pep talk. He delivers Soliloquys, merely a word, merely a big word, equivalent to Lotta's nonsense.
In the video, she was stumbling, bumping into yet another word salad filled with meaningless admiration.
“When we think about these moments when we see what's being filmed, let's look at it, you know, nature hates vacuum,” she told performers.
“Let's fill it where there are vacant seats. Please tell us that the reality is that our country's progress is about expanding rights, not limiting rights.”
Huh?
Her messy hair fell on her face as she spoke on the K-turn. And with every inane declaration, her eyes were bulging like an ET, her chin retreating to her head. It's the face when they've been studying Kendall Jackson's complete work.
“We have to wake up, and that doesn't mean we don't see beauty in everything. All of these things coexist, but we oppose something. I believe that I will fight for something, not something,” she continued.
And, when you think about it, in the alternative gala universe, this will be our president.
Just a few days ago, Vice President JD Vance was in Munich, giving an important, bold, substantive speech on the dangers of creeping censorship, and the timing was touching about the massive unchecked migration.
Vance was doing some much-needed heavy industry, especially after “60 minutes” unconsciously emphasized his point. Last night, it aired a segment on Germany's approach to combating “hate speech” online, including an early morning attack on a man's apartment by six police officers. His crime was posting something online.
It was horrifying to see three prosecutors being actively whimpered about infantilizing society as a whole and stealing citizens' mobile phones like stifling, enthusiastic hall monitors.
Although VP, Vance addresses the critical issues of our time: inconvenient truths that threaten Western civilization and European democracy.
And my mind was floating on Harris as I watched him make waves with this historic, heavy speech. She has been on the national stage for nearly a decade, and I still have little knowledge of her ideological position. The only clarity she offered was the idea on the far left during “The Great Awokening.”
Her move to the centre during the election was then broadcast by her spokesman and did not challenge the media. Apart from Brett Bayer, she was never pushed to explain herself. flat
“60 Minutes” had to extensively edit her interivew to create a semi-coherent answer.
The only useless feeling she can convey regularly is that she firmly believes that Americans have hopes and dreams. They have a desire.
And she appeared on the show, and although it was in a casual context, what I believe is her default setting confirmed that our country had made the right decision.
And the contrast between her and Vance – and yes Trump – could not have been any more impressive. Her intellectual offerings are much weaker in comparison.
Not only was Harris not worthy of this moment, but she's not good at this. She was out of her depth in so many ways.
However, she warned that she would not “go quietly to the night” after losing in November.
However, if Dems “unable” herself “to date” and can't drop her, they won't win immediately. And they are not worth it either.
