SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Rubio Rips U.N. as ‘Antagonistic’ on Ukraine-Russia Resolution

WASHINGTON, DC — Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke only to the Breitbart News Monday. The United States said it voted against the UN action to bashing Russians for the war in Ukraine because it was “hostile” and rebutted the efforts. Bring both sides to the table to end the war.

After the United States voted against a broader resolution that passed the United Nations nationwide, the United States later led a narrower resolution calling for an end to the war that passed the UN Security Council. Rubio, who sat for a long, exclusive on-camera interview with Breitbart News at the State Department's podcast studio on Monday evening, responded to these developments for the first time in this interview.

“The broader resolution believes that if the UN is useful in the 21st century, the UN needs to return to its Charter mission, which is the prevention and end of war and conflict.” “So we can feel that everyone knows and go back to the past three years and read newspaper articles and understand what happened in Ukraine. But now the president is very clear. As he said, President Trump wants to end this war. He thinks too many people have died and wants to end it. Frankly, which I didn't feel that having anything to the UN, which is hostile to the side, was encouraged. We're taking these people to the table. Unfortunately, Ukraine agrees. No, they wanted to move their own things forward. Then we went to the Security Council with compromise. It was a very fair language and basically “war is terrible.” It's.” I would say, in other words, war is terrible and too many people are dead. It reminded the United Nations that the purpose of the United Nations is to end wars and prevent conflicts, not making it difficult to end conflicts. So I thought it was good that we accomplished it on a safe board, and the Russians did not refuse it. I'm not saying it's going to end this conflict and I can't wait until Elise Stefanik is there because it's great to have her leadership, but we The language of peace is a better language and hopefully promotes the cause. ”

Trump was asked about the US moving to the United Nations earlier that day when he was with French President Emmanuel Macron in the White House, but why did the US vote against it? He hadn't said anything other than “self-evident.”

“I don't want to explain that now, but it's kind of self-evident,” Trump told reporters with a pool spray with Macron on his side.

So Rubio's explanation here is the first detailed explanation from the US government as to why the US voted against its broader resolution, and instead a more specific solution at the Security Council. defended.

It is also important to be confirmed, saying Rubio is looking forward to former Congressman Elise Stefanik (R-NY), the UN's US ambassador Trump candidate. Stefanik is one of the last cabinet-level spots that have not yet been confirmed in the US Senate, but she has almost gone through a final step. Stefanik also placed emphasis on UN dramas via social media on Monday evening, as it was worth it.

Trump also told White House reporters on Monday that he believes the war in Ukraine could end with a “week” issue. Rubio said in an interview with Breitbart News at the State Department on Monday that Trump is the “President of Peace.”

“Well, the president wants to finish it yesterday,” Rubio said. “He already thinks too many people have died, and there's too much destruction. By the way, I think everyone should be very pleased that President Trump is the president of peace. We There is a president who wants to end not starting a new war. He wants to end what does not exacerbate or extend human suffering. Now, it is conflict. It is war. It's coming and going. Starting with the Russians, we have to take them to the table. So we met them last week. The basic question of that meeting was “This conflict was about Are you interested in finishing it? “Many people don't know the answer to that. If you talk to some in Europe, they will tell you that Putin is not interested in ending the war. They said they were under the right conditions. We did not discuss what these conditions were. So, the next step is to meet them again at some point. Do you start out to outline the right groups of people in the room and what it takes to stop the war? And obviously, we have to ask the same questions as Ukraine. Because you can't stop the war unless both parties agree. So, whether it's days or weeks, or what you have, we'll start the process. It may not work, but why everyone criticizes President Trump for ending a war that sacrifices billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of lives, and the incredibly continuous human suffering. Sho. ”

Rubio's exclusive interview with Breitbart News at the State Department on Monday is coming soon.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News