When they were first built, the skyscrapers and other towering buildings are impressive. But it's time for structural weaknesses to increase the risk of collapse, injury or killing many people working in their daily business. Reinforcing a building sometimes works for a while, but often we reach a stage where things are most careful actions to destroy in a controlled way.
The United States faces similar structural threats today. The two most urgent and fundamental dangers are the unidentified administrative state of homes, as well as the decline of many NATO partner countries among globalist NGOs. The role of the administrative and the United States in NATO was a product of postwar efforts to create stability and order after World War II. However, these institutions have grown far beyond their original purpose, and now pose significant risks to national security, economic stability and constitutional freedom.
Both the established administrative states and the present alliance with Western Europe show serious structural weaknesses.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's government efficiency project exposes the depth of corruption and waste within administrative bureaucrats and their NGO partners. As a result, Americans are beginning to see how these networks leave ordinary people struggling to provide basic needs such as food and rent. The findings also reveal the extent of the country's unstable fiscal situation.
However, few Americans are aware of how European countries have eliminated our resources through their actions and undoubtedly poisoned relationships. The US was responsible for most of NATO's costs and defence efforts, but European countries ignored their troops and were unable to meet their defence commitments.
European countries are making things worse by burdening their economy with unsustainable welfare programs and excessive regulations that curb innovation. At the same time, they imposed unfair tariffs on US goods, increasing economic tensions.
Even more troublesome, they are trying to impose restrictions on the use of the US energy, freedom of speech, information flow, and even the participation of political parties in national governments. Recent examples are easy to find, and Vice President Vance recently highlighted some of these issues at the Munich Conference.
Meanwhile, they hope that the US will continue to emit its resources and recognize Ukraine to NATO. This will commit the US military to respond to Russia and silence criticism of its actions on social media.
Hypocrisy is phenomenal and offensive. For evidence, look at how much Russian oil and gas Germany is buying today despite its refusal to allow Israeli natural gas imports.
Is it time to consider a controlled dismantling of NATO? probably. After the Soviet Union fell 34 years ago, the alliance should have been restructured or dissolved. Instead, President Clinton and his successors gradually expanded NATO by adding former Soviet and communist countries to the Russian border. It was completely predictable that this strategy would elicit a response.
We should not be even more drawn into this stupidity. Alliances based on mutual benefits and fair contributions are valuable. But what unfolded in combat on the whims of Britain, France and Germany is not based on American assessments of threats and costs.
Conclusion: Both the established administrative state and the current alliance with Western Europe show serious structural weaknesses. It's time to consider dismantling or reforming them before they collapse into American citizens and the entire nation.
