SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Loyalty over merit: Pete Hegseth's dangerous military makeover

Don't be distracted by him A suit decorated like a cartoon Or slave focus An imaginary enemy like “Day.” President Trump's choice of Pete Hegses as Secretary of Defense not only represents Hegses as a dangerous precedent; Uniquely inexperienced For work. He is weak by design.

His opening act proves it: Heggs has been adjusted Unprecedented removal of top military leadersIncludes the first-ever dismissal of two most senior women in the military, the chairman of the co-headed and the chairman of the military. Perhaps he is even more worried Purge of senior military services lawyers – General officers who understand their oath are not to the individual, but to the Constitution.

Unlike Hegseth, General CQ Brown and Admirals Lisa Francietti and Linda Fagan rose to the highest work in the military (the most prominent institution in our country) based on their achievements, abilities and personality. The fact that Brown is black and Francetti and Fagan's woman is a powerful symbol of our military leaders who perfectly represent our modern fighting power, and is a testament to their grit, aiming for leadership with fewer and less role models.

Their service and achievements should serve as inspiration for all Americans, and they should send messages of merit, courage and commitment, as opposed to the bitterness of cable news experts and divisive social media voices.

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan Kane for Trump and Hegses will replace Brown as extraordinary as the chairman. Caine is not only traditionally expected, but Legally necessary for roles. Trump abandons these requirements and can remember Kane in active duty, but this will send a clear message.

Were you not capable of offering 4 stars at the moment? And what does that mean for America's most respected meritocracy? He wears a magazine hat in violation of military regulations Will it be a major qualification for the best position?

What I know from nearly a decade of working with the Pentagon with both civilian and military leaders is that meritocratic leadership is indeed important. Experienced leaders arrive at senior positions with confidence enough to encourage and accept dissent. They intentionally seek a diverse range of opinions, identify equally skilled peers, and inform high stakes deliberations. They make harsh calls based on evidence. And they realize that when the decision came to their desk, if it was easy, someone far below would have already made it.

Over the next few months, Hegses' weakness shines on a global stage. You will encounter engagement with foreign partners. Here at home, a service member who has dedicated his life and career to his country will look right through him. This creates a deeper threat: by deliberately establishing weaker civil leaders; Hegseth's Paranoia It puts the very principle of civilian domination of the military, the foundations of American democracy.

The most effective civilian surveillance comes from leaders who complement military expertise and do not undermine it. Together, civilian and military leadership must assess risks and make decisions that serve the interests of the nation. The purging of Hegses, the most skilled general and admiral in the army, betrays this important partnership. It is fully exhibited in front of today's officers and enlisted troops, making this important partnership a generational detriment.

Finally, Hegseth's Planned Reduces the Department of Defense's civilian labor force It doesn't make it more efficient. Rather, many of these important responsibilities shift to military members of reserve elements that become detailed to replace civilians in staff work. This assumes that money can be used to fund these backfills as the current budgetary continuity resolution does not fund such alternatives.

The remaining gaps will almost certainly be sourced from defense contractors. Defense contractors need to need funding and lack in-depth knowledge of the complex policies and programs that current Department of Defense civilians currently possess. The final result is nothing more than a massive shift from teeth to tail. It undermines reserves and the operational military preparation of the National Guard to replace today's expert civilian labor force.

Hegseth's influence certainly lengthens his tenure. By hindering the reliability of civilian surveillance, he is shattering the military's trust that civil leaders of any party can rise and put the nation's security first.

These wounds can be reversed under another secretary with a disposition that attracts experienced advisers about high-risk changes, but that's not why Heggs was chosen. He was chosen not for courage, but for compliance.

Alex Wagner was an assistant Air Force secretary during the Biden administration due to air force and reserve issues. He was the Chief of Staff for the Secretary of Army and played multiple roles in the Secretary of Defense Office during the Obama administration.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News