Lee Zeldin, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator for Breitbart Fight Club, said the agency will consider the “Holy Grail of Climate Change,” the “Holy Grail of Climate Change,” which the agency has generated over $1 trillion in the wake of regulations.
EPA administrator Zeldin spoke with Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow and Breitbart News Washington Bureau Chief Matthew Boyle on his efforts to unravel the troubling regulations created by the agency.
Members of the Breitbart News Fight Club asked Zeldin about the so-called danger detection, which created a legal basis for the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The findings state that greenhouse gas emissions are a suspected threat to public health and welfare. The EPA says the danger discovery costs Americans trillions of dollars.
“This is considered the holy grail of climate change religion,” Zeldin said.
Discovering danger It happened From the 2007 Supreme Court lawsuit, Massachusetts vs. EPAthe George W. Bush-era EPA decided that it had made a mistake in 2003 when the petitioner rejected a petition to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars that it allegedly caused climate change.
“Massachusetts has determined that the general legal definition of the Clean Air Act for “air pollutants” is broad enough to include carbon dioxide. “Massachusetts explicitly did not recognize that an EPA was necessary to regulate these emissions from these sources,” the EPA wrote.
Zeldin EPA says the Obama-Biden EPA took a “unorthodox” approach to creating danger detections.
When the court sent the matter back to the EPA, the agency proceeded in an unorthodox way. Slicing and digging the language of laws, It created a completely different “danger detection” than the actual rule creation settings. Standard for car emissions. The EPA claimed that Congress had the authority to do this because it wasn’t specific. It is forbidden to take this approach. By adopting this approach, the discovery of the risk of intentionally neglecting the costs of regulations that the EPA knew about intentionally neglected the costs of regulations that follow the discovery, and in fact ignored the impact of those regulations on other policies.
The finding also took an unorthodox approach that was considered a problematic “contaminant.” It focuses not only on carbon dioxide, but on a mixture of six gases. Contrary to popular belief, it never found We draw a linear conclusion that carbon dioxide from new car engines is causing danger. Instead, we looked at this mixture of six gases from all sources around the world and used multiple mental leaps to determine that this mixture had not been occurring, contributed to an unknown amount of climate change above zero, and that climate change contributed to an unknown amount of public health risks above zero. The discovery then looked at US vehicle emissions. This is the only thing that allows this section of the Clean Air Act to actually regulate the EPA, saying that the pie is large enough (about 4% of global emissions) is “causing or contributing” to the six gas mixture. [Emphasis added]
Zeldin said that now is the right time to consider finding danger, saying, “That’s what I was told, we can’t see it, we can’t touch it, we can’t talk about it. We can’t buy it. I think it’s a good thing that we actually have this conversation.”
“We found the dangers to be found, when carbon dioxide mixes with five other well-mixed gases called greenhouse gases, they don’t even release the gas from those six greenhouse houses by the vehicle. It contributes to climate change, not to cause climate change. That climate change puts public health at risk,” Zeldin continued.
“They don’t say that carbon dioxide is equal to a pollutant. They don’t say that carbon dioxide is at risk to public health,” he added.
Zeldin said discovery of danger was the source of countless Obama-Biden-era regulations.
He said, “They use danger discoveries to create all sorts of new rules during the Obama administration and come back during the Biden administration. Since then, we’ve not only seen all of these rules. And then it’s important for us. It’s important to do due diligence.”
For example, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Energy, Climate and Environmental Centre; I said EPA regulations arising from the detection of dangers contribute to car prices, rising from $23,000 in 2009 to nearly $50,000 today.
The EPA relies on the detection of the risks of seven vehicle regulations, reportedly having a total cost of more than $1 trillion, according to the agency’s own regulatory impact analysis. It also cites many other regulations beyond the automobile.
Sean Moran is a policy reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him with x @seanmoran3.
