SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Experts divided as Trump stops Yemen bombing after Houthi ceasefire agreement

President Donald Trump’s unexpected decision to cease U.S. airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants has sparked some optimism as a possible turning point in the conflict.

On Tuesday, Trump announced in the Oval Office the official conclusion of Operation Rough Rider, a 50-day air campaign that targeted over 1,000 locations across Yemen.

“The Houthis said they don’t want to fight anymore,” Trump noted during a statement made at the White House. “They claim they won’t target ships again. That was our goal… So, we’ll cease the bombing.”

Oman’s foreign minister, Bad al-Busadi, who has been part of the peace negotiations, confirmed that discussions yielded a ceasefire agreement. “In the future, neither side will attack the other, including American ships in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Straits, ensuring freedom of navigation and facilitating international trade,” he stated.

However, U.S. military actions in Yemen continue since a Houthi missile struck near an Israeli airport. Some militant groups have vowed to enact an “air blockade.”

While Trump characterized the ceasefire as a straightforward military win, experts suggest that the road to this outcome involved deliberate diplomatic efforts.

“This was aimed at linking Houthi attacks directly to Iran,” remarked Kasa Pogl, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. “The Trump administration clearly indicated that further assaults would have repercussions for Tehran, which was crucial for achieving this result.”

The March campaign was initiated following a rise in Houthi assaults on international shipping, intensifying last weekend when missiles fired from Houthi-controlled areas landed near Israel’s Ben-Gurion airport. In retaliation, Israel launched airstrikes on a major airport in Sanaa, which military insiders claim severely impacted Houthi air capabilities.

Lt. Colonel Eric Navarro, who oversees the Red Sea Security Initiative at the Middle East Forum, described the ceasefire as a “result of significant pressure,” highlighting the targeted U.S. strikes on Houthi command centers and weapon depots in conjunction with Israeli airstrikes.

“They recognized the inevitability of their situation,” Navarro said. “I believe this pressure must be sustained over time, not only against the Houthis but also against the Iranian regime.”

From a military perspective, Trump’s strategy utilized essential resources, including bombers from Diego Garcia and two U.S. aircraft carriers in the area. This show of force, combined with clear diplomatic messaging, seems to have spurred the ceasefire—at least for now.

Despite Trump’s framing of the ceasefire as a military triumph, some analysts question the real threat posed by the Houthis.

“Regardless of whether the group ceases attacks on U.S. vessels, Trump’s unexpected announcement to end airstrikes on the Houthis was sensible,” said Rosemary Keranick, who leads the Middle East Program for Defense Priorities. “The Houthi threat has often been exaggerated.”

Keranick also pointed out that the group’s assaults on shipping had minimal impact on the U.S. economy and that attacks actually decreased during the recent wave of militant operations in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. “The Houthis’ most significant accomplishment was making the U.S. spend around $7 billion on bombing them,” she remarked.

“Trump’s decisive moves illustrate that an alternative exists to continuous escalation in the Middle East,” she added.

Still, not all military analysts share confidence in the Houthis’ reliability moving forward.

“I remain cautious about groups like the Houthis adhering to their commitments,” Navarro commented. “We must remain vigilant and implement a broader strategy that includes military, economic, and informational pressures, along with support for local alternatives to Houthi control in Yemen.”

For the time being, though, the Trump administration is portraying this halt as a strategic win, demonstrating that military might, when combined with diplomatic clarity, can lead to tangible political outcomes.

“A massive victory. President Trump pledged to restore freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, and he employed significant U.S. power to expedite that promise.”

“If they can communicate this successfully,” Kasa Pogl said, “It will mark a substantial victory for the Trump administration.”

Whether this ceasefire will hold or merely represents a brief pause in the extended conflict remains uncertain. For the moment, bombs have stopped falling, and Washington is proclaiming a victory.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News