SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Supreme Court allows Trump administration to end TPS program for Venezuelans

Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to End Protections for Venezuelans

On May 19, 2025, the Supreme Court made a significant decision, permitting the Trump administration to rescind legal protections previously extended to many Venezuelans by the Biden administration. This move came despite vociferous dissent from one of the court’s liberal justices.

The Trump administration had announced earlier in January that it would eliminate the Temporary Protection Status (TPS) for Venezuelans, which had provided safeguards against deportation due to ongoing violence and turmoil in their home country.

This action followed a petition by the Justice Department to the Supreme Court after a federal judge in San Francisco temporarily halted the initiative. The judge had described the move as seemingly rooted in negative stereotypes.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, was the only justice to oppose the emergency order issued by the court on Monday. Interestingly, neither the majority nor Jackson elaborated on their positions in written form.

This ruling marks another legal win for the Trump administration, which often seeks emergency appeals from the Supreme Court following nationwide injunctions affecting federal policies.

In a related development, tens of thousands of Afghans residing in the US learned they would soon face deportation after the Department of Homeland Security announced the termination of TPS for all Afghan refugees. This announcement was made by Secretary Christie Noem.

“For decades, administration secretaries have ended TPS designations when the statutory conditions no longer warranted them—that’s precisely what Chief Noem did here.”

As of now, the Supreme Court has not delivered a final ruling on President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship for children born in the US to illegal immigrants or temporary visa holders. Oral arguments for this case took place on May 15, 2025, and a decision is anticipated in the coming months.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News