Congressional Hearing on 23andMe and Social Media Posts
Representative Brandon Gill from Texas questioned Anne Wojcicki, the co-founder and former CEO of 23andMe, regarding her company’s social media posts about transgender pronouns. During the hearing, which took place on Tuesday, she acknowledged that she hadn’t clarified the meaning of those terms in her posts.
This inquiry comes amid concerns about the handling of user genetic data, especially in light of 23andMe filing for bankruptcy. Wojcicki appeared before a U.S. House committee several months after stepping down as CEO in March. The focus of the hearing was the potential risks to data privacy, particularly as the company’s future hangs in the balance.
Gill pressed Wojcicki on a politically sensitive post relating to the various pronouns promoted by 23andMe. He noted that the company had been relatively quiet about these matters but had shared a post, “Pride Moon,” since 2021.
In the post, it was stated that using correct pronouns can positively impact the mental health of transgender individuals, reducing risks of depression and suicide. The post included graphics and made a push for improvements in products that cater to trans and non-binary customers.
In the midst of the questioning, Gill asked Wojcicki if she understood what certain pronouns meant, to which she admitted, “I don’t really know either.” This led to a broader discussion about the implications of using correct pronouns and the responsibilities of companies when it comes to inclusivity.
During the hearing, Gill emphasized the significance of understanding these terms, asserting that they play a crucial role in public health discussions, particularly concerning mental well-being for transgender individuals. Wojcicki countered by stating that while she was the CEO, she couldn’t oversee every post made by the company’s communications team.
Gill pushed further, suggesting that the messaging from 23andMe was politically charged and asked if she felt she had a responsibility to know what the posts meant. Wojcicki didn’t agree, maintaining that her role didn’t cover every detail of social media messaging.
Concluding the hearing, Gill expressed concerns about 23andMe’s shift from a genetic research company to what he described as a “social justice organization.” This raised questions about whether Wojcicki’s leadership influenced the company’s current social stance.
