Security Clearance Revoked for Deep State Agent

A deep state agent, recently identified as an imposter by Blaze News, has had her security clearance revoked.

Last month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and National Intelligence Director Tarshi Gabbard released a declassified document. This document suggested that the Obama administration might have orchestrated a Russian hoax.

In response to the situation, elements within the deep state swiftly engaged in damage control.

Former CIA Director John Brennan has portrayed himself as a victim on cable news, while Susan Miller, the lawyer for former DNI James Clapper—who has been with the CIA for nearly 40 years—has labeled Gabbard a liar and has gone on various media outlets denying the new evidence.

“Susan Miller was not the author of the 2017 ICA.”

Miller, a former Obama official and significant Democratic donor, has claimed key insights into the development of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) from 2017. She has gained traction in the liberal media because of her assertion that she authored the document.

She stated, for example, “National Intelligence Director and the White House are lying again,” according to NBC News.

Miller’s claims regarding the Russian hoax were taken seriously by some in the liberal media, bolstered by her assertion of involvement with the now-revive ICA.

“It’s not even a non-negative negation.”

It was revealed by Blaze News that Miller’s supposed leadership role in the 2017 ICA is, in fact, an elaborate fabrication, similar to the claims around Russian collusion.

A source close to the assessment informed Blaze News, “Susan Miller was not the author of the 2017 ICA.”

Further confirmation came from investigative journalist Matt Taibbi, who noted that she stated, “I’m not an author. I’m not involved.”

Interestingly, Miller’s attempts to assert her authorship are curious, especially considering the growing evidence indicating that the ICA is fraught with inaccuracies.

Reports from June indicated multiple procedural anomalies during the ICA’s creation, including compressed timelines and strict compartmentalization.

Recent declassifications have further illustrated that the ICA may be a Brandon-manufactured fiction, rife with misquotations and falsehoods.

One email released by Gabbard illustrates the apparent adjustments made by officials regarding the ICA, indicating a willingness to make compromises.

When questioned about her actual role in the ICA, Miller explained, “My team and I wrote a CIA analysis on Russia’s impact on elections.” She claimed this report was used as the foundation for the ICA. “Certainly, I didn’t write any ICAs, but ODNI used my report as their base,” she insisted.

Taibbi commented on her reaction, saying, “It’s not even a negative negativity. It’s oops.”

Miller’s credibility appears to have taken a significant hit.

According to two officials familiar with the issue, Miller’s security clearance was reportedly terminated last Thursday.

Sources within the administration mentioned, “The Russian hoax aimed to undermine President Trump’s entire first term. Individuals involved in that cannot be trusted with security clearance.”

Miller had previously boasted about her “full clearance” on LinkedIn, though that page has since been deleted.

“This woman shouldn’t hold high-level security clearance after advocating for Russian hoaxes. Her actions have harmed Americans,” stated a senior Pentagon official.

Despite everything, it seems the International Spy Museum still plans to award Miller with the Hidden Hero Award in November.