Critics are questioning the way the New York Times described the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), especially given that the group has faced criticism from anti-Israel advocates.
On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted 103-98 on legislation put forth by outgoing Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) aimed at reducing military and humanitarian aid to Israel. While the bill didn’t pass, it garnered majority support from Democrats, with Massie being the sole Republican to vote in favor.
The Times pointed out an increasing number of Democrats who have committed to rejecting donations from AIPAC, which traditionally supports both parties in favor of Israel’s alliance with the U.S. One such pledge came from Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts.
Moulton, who is running for Senate, indicated he would no longer accept donations from AIPAC, labeled by the Times as a “far-right pro-Israel lobbying group”—a characterization that has drawn skepticism. The article mentioned that prominent Democratic figures have historically participated in AIPAC’s annual policy conference, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Cory Booker, who spoke at the last conference in March 2020. It’s notable that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries voted against the bill, while former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had spoken at the 2019 conference, supported defunding Israel.
Social media users reacted with disbelief to the Times’ labeling of AIPAC. John Podhoretz, a commentary editor, challenged the idea that a group with a significant Democratic staff could be considered far-right. Columnist Karol Markowitz expressed a wish for AIPAC to be right in its stance, while Joel Pollack labeled the group as left-leaning, hinting that those who see Israel’s self-defense measures as extreme might belong to the far-right. Jewish Insider’s Josh Kraushaar remarked on the disconnect between media portrayals of Israel and the reality that many pro-Israel Jews align with the Democratic Party.
Neither the New York Times nor AIPAC provided comments in response to inquiries.
Since October, there has been a notable decrease in Democratic support for Israel, contrasted with continued backing from Republicans. AIPAC has been targeted by anti-Israel advocates, who often promote the unfounded narrative that the Israeli government buys influence in U.S. politics, even though AIPAC operates as an American organization led by pro-Israel citizens.
The relationship with Israel is increasingly seen as a benchmark within the Democratic Party, particularly among its progressive members, and is likely to remain a prominent topic in the 2028 presidential election.
AIPAC labeled as hard-right, facing backlash from commentators
Critics are questioning the way the New York Times described the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), especially given that the group has faced criticism from anti-Israel advocates.
On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted 103-98 on legislation put forth by outgoing Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) aimed at reducing military and humanitarian aid to Israel. While the bill didn’t pass, it garnered majority support from Democrats, with Massie being the sole Republican to vote in favor.
The Times pointed out an increasing number of Democrats who have committed to rejecting donations from AIPAC, which traditionally supports both parties in favor of Israel’s alliance with the U.S. One such pledge came from Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts.
Moulton, who is running for Senate, indicated he would no longer accept donations from AIPAC, labeled by the Times as a “far-right pro-Israel lobbying group”—a characterization that has drawn skepticism. The article mentioned that prominent Democratic figures have historically participated in AIPAC’s annual policy conference, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Cory Booker, who spoke at the last conference in March 2020. It’s notable that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries voted against the bill, while former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had spoken at the 2019 conference, supported defunding Israel.
Social media users reacted with disbelief to the Times’ labeling of AIPAC. John Podhoretz, a commentary editor, challenged the idea that a group with a significant Democratic staff could be considered far-right. Columnist Karol Markowitz expressed a wish for AIPAC to be right in its stance, while Joel Pollack labeled the group as left-leaning, hinting that those who see Israel’s self-defense measures as extreme might belong to the far-right. Jewish Insider’s Josh Kraushaar remarked on the disconnect between media portrayals of Israel and the reality that many pro-Israel Jews align with the Democratic Party.
Neither the New York Times nor AIPAC provided comments in response to inquiries.
Since October, there has been a notable decrease in Democratic support for Israel, contrasted with continued backing from Republicans. AIPAC has been targeted by anti-Israel advocates, who often promote the unfounded narrative that the Israeli government buys influence in U.S. politics, even though AIPAC operates as an American organization led by pro-Israel citizens.
The relationship with Israel is increasingly seen as a benchmark within the Democratic Party, particularly among its progressive members, and is likely to remain a prominent topic in the 2028 presidential election.
Related News
‘Jurassic Park’ actor Sam Neill battled cancer before facing pneumonia, co-star reveals
Bill Belichick’s daughter-in-law is reportedly facing an arrest order for skipping her speeding court appearance.