The Biden administration recently said it was “considering” whether the president has the “authority” to issue an executive order aimed at closing the southern border. Experts said: Daily Caller News Foundation He says that all possible countermeasures are “shams.”
on tuesday, univision He released an interview with Biden in which he was asked about his plan to stem the flow of migrants entering the country through the southern border. blaze news Previously reported.
Univision’s Enrique Acevedo asked the president whether he had “made a final decision to take an executive order in terms of what he wants to do at the border, including the authority to close the border.”
Mr. Biden responded that he had “indicated that,” but was unsure whether “I have the authority to do that.”
“And some people say we should give it a try. And if I’m shut down by the court, I’m shut down by the court. But we’re trying to work it out, right now. “We are trying to solve this problem,” he explained.
After the interview, the White House press secretary said: fox news digital“No amount of aggressive executive action can deliver the important policy reforms and additional resources that Congress could provide and Republicans have rejected.”
The statement referenced the $118 billion, 370-page bill the Senate unveiled in February, which drew criticism from Republicans. The bill included funding for military aid and southern border security provisions.
Multiple immigration experts told DCNF that the Biden administration’s potential plan to enforce executive orders will not solve the immigration crisis.
“Even if Biden limits executive action to reforming refugee law, if he continues to bring in people on parole and sentence people to indefinite sentences,” Jessica Vaughan, director of policy research at the Center for Immigration Studies, told the news outlet. That is meaningless.” Work permit. ”
Since President Biden took office, the White House has expanded the parole program to admit more immigrants.by washington postthe administration granted parole to more than 2 million immigrants, compared to 300,000 under Trump.
“It’s fair to say that action by Congress would help, but…the most impactful action has to come from the president. These include ending catch-and-release policies and imposing penalties for illegal border crossings. and the suspension of issuance by government agencies” permits, and permits. [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] to work inland,” Vaughn told DCNF.
“If he wants to make it harder to abuse the asylum system, he has the power to do it now, and he has had it all along, but he has chosen not to use it,” Vaughn said. continued. “This is all a sham and he and his advisers are kidding themselves if they think this will help reverse the loss of public confidence in his administration.”
Vaughn argued that the current administration is unlikely to make any major changes to border policy.
“He has had these policies in place for three years, and he has continued for three years to identify the problems and listen to the concerns of people in communities across the country who are struggling to deal with the consequences.” Vaughn added. “What would motivate him to change something now?”
Stephen Camarota, director of research at CIS, told DCNF that governments need to do more than change asylum laws to resolve the crisis.
“Changes to asylum law may help, but we need to actually refuse people, repatriate them immediately, and publicize this in sending countries. We don’t do that in so many cases,” Camarota explained. “Restructuring the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy, re-enlisting cooperation from Central American countries, tightening domestic enforcement, and above all significantly increasing detentions all require at least a change in the standards of credible fear.” But as far as I know, the administration isn’t talking about those things.”
A potential executive order from the Biden administration will likely face legal challenges, and the White House likely anticipates that, according to Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory and policy at CIS.
“The purpose of executive orders like this appears to be to deceive American voters,” Jacobs told DCNF. “By issuing 212F proclamations and additional regulations purporting to limit asylum eligibility, the administration can anticipate bad court decisions in the Ninth Circuit.”
“At that point, President Biden could tell voters that he has ‘made an effort’ to address the border crisis, but he will ultimately blame Congress for not taking action to change the law.” ” continued Mr. Jacobs. “At the same time, the Biden administration will limit the ability of police officers to enforce existing laws and maintain a policy of paroling inadmissible aliens en masse to enter the United States. “This would be in direct violation of the laws Congress passed to regulate immigration.” ”
The Biden administration did not respond to DCNF’s request for comment.
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
