House Passes Resolution on Boulder Attack Amid Democratic Opposition

In a recent vote, more than 100 Democrats opposed a House resolution, led by Republicans, condemning the terrorist attacks in Boulder, Colorado. The resolution passed with a vote of 280-113, with 75 Democrats joining their Republican counterparts in support. Interestingly, there were also six lawmakers—five from the Democratic side and one Republican—who voted “present.”

This legislation arose in response to the attack that occurred last week and was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans from Colorado. Many Democrats expressed that they found the language in the resolution to be politically charged and problematic.

This resolution not only condemned the attack but also seemed to shift some blame onto what’s referred to as the Blue Sanctuary jurisdiction, which has been at odds with federal immigration authorities.

Another piece of legislation, which broadly condemned the increase in anti-Semitism in the United States, received much wider bipartisan backing. It passed unanimously, 400-0, with two lawmakers voting “present.”

Rep. Evans pointed out the case of suspect Mohammed Sabri Soliman, emphasizing concerns about granting tourism visas and work permits that could pose a danger based on non-compliance with visa terms. There are also federal accusations against certain Egyptians after Hamas reportedly attempted to attack peaceful protesters about the ongoing situation in Gaza.

There’s a sentiment that various cities, particularly those controlled by Democrats like Los Angeles and Nashville, have criticized the enforcement actions of the Trump administration related to immigration. In fact, the response to anti-ICE protests in these areas has triggered significant backlash from Democratic officials.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries took issue with Evans’ resolution, labeling it insincere leadership against anti-Semitism. He remarked, “Who is this guy? He has no serious interest in the fight against anti-Semitism in America. This is not a serious effort.” Jeffries characterized the situation as an “American tragedy” that should not be used as a political weapon.

In response, Evans emphasized his background as a police officer and lawmaker, suggesting that aggressive rhetoric from Democratic leaders enables the persistence of anti-Semitism.

Rep. Dan Goldman, who is Jewish, also voiced his criticism, calling out the resolution for echoing sentiments expressed in previous resolutions focused on political gain rather than genuine concern for anti-Semitism. Goldman said, “We Jews are sick and tired as pawns.”

However, Rep. Jeff Van Drew defended Evans’ resolution, pointing out it addressed not just anti-Semitism but broader victims of violence, despite focusing on immigration. He acknowledged that his own resolution did not delve into immigration issues, stating, “But he brings a valid point not only for Jews but for many innocent victims.”

The lawmakers who chose to vote “present” in Van Drew’s resolution included Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat from Michigan, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia. Greene later expressed on social media that while anti-Semitic hate crimes are wrong, other hate crimes against various groups also deserved attention, pointing out a perceived silence on those issues.